|
Post by Infinity Blade on May 15, 2023 6:03:26 GMT 5
I could see why the average person views 4 out of the 5 as ugly but what's wrong with wildebeest? I've seen some people refer to the wildebeest as looking like an awkward spare parts animal. Like here: www.flickr.com/photos/jillclardy/33522369498Although to be honest, I think it and the spotted hyena look rather tame.
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on May 22, 2023 3:48:22 GMT 5
Apparently cows sometimes need to have methane drained from their bodies.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on May 22, 2023 5:18:00 GMT 5
TIL that when the Bronx Zoo was creating its Elephant House (now the Zoo Center) in 1907, there was a contest among sculptors to decide who would decorate it. It ended dead-even between Alexander Phimister Proctor and Charles R. Knight. As a result, the New York Zoological Society (now the Wildlife Conservation Society) assigned Proctor to sculpt the Asian elephant head, while Knight would sculpt the African elephant head ( link->).
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Jul 21, 2023 2:22:18 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Aug 1, 2023 23:26:57 GMT 5
Last night I learned that there were A LOT more unused segments and creatures for Dinosaur Revolution than I thought. Here are some that I didn't know were supposed to be a thing. dinosaurrevolution.fandom.com/wiki/List_of_unused_stories_%26_segments- A segment taking place in a Triassic ocean, and was to feature Mixosaurus, Placodus, and Nothosaurus. A Mixosaurus is seen attacking a Placodus here. I get vibes of 19th century reconstructions of ichthyosaurs attacking other marine reptiles, a concept that actually holds up better than most people think. - A segment that was supposed to be about iguanodonts getting drunk on fermented fruits plus a predator. There were two versions of this segment, set in Europe and North America, respectively, but neither made it into the final product. Given how similar this sounds to the Shroomosaurus Shunosaurus that did make it into the final product, I'm going to assume that this concept was recycled for that segment. You can tell at this point that Dinosaur Revolution was not originally meant to be a documentary. - An Ugly Duckling-inspired segment, featuring an albino Triceratops hatchling. It gets rejected by its mother, then wanders around until it is adopted by a mother Pachycephalosaurus. - A segment featuring a gang war between a flock of Dimorphodon and Dorygnathus. I think this was a missed opportunity. I didn't realize how paleomedia is sorely lacking in pterosaurs being each other's worst enemies until I watched Prehistoric Planet. Both genera also had a respectable, if not downright nasty set of teeth. - An Elm Street-inspired segment featuring Prenocephale, Therizinosaurus, and Alioramus. From the looks of it, the Therizinosaurus gets burnt by a forest fire and goes on a rampage or something. Yeah... - A segment where a herd of Stegoceras gang up on a Daspletosaurus attacking one of its members. A Styracosaurus joins the fray too. I don't know why a bunch of 40 kg at most bonehead bois think they can stop a 2-3 tonne tyrannosaur, but it looks like it would've been an entertaining segment for sure. - Lastly, there were supposed to be some hadrosaur-centric stories, meant to deconstruct the defenseless hadrosaur trope, but these were cut. It really is a shame.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Sept 24, 2023 6:24:32 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Sept 25, 2023 2:33:00 GMT 5
So TIL that in 2006, a red fox entered the saiga enclosure of the Cologne Zoo, Germany. The zoo first got the saigas in 1976, and were part of a breeding program there ever since. But when the fox got into the enclosure, it killed all the newborn saigas and the breeding females, ending three decades of husbandry in a single attack. The male survived because it was separated from the females during the attack (the females and newborns refused to enter the stalls for the night) and lived there until dying in 2009. An overview of the saiga antelope (Saiga tatarica) in captivity in Europe and the United States-> ( additional source->) It honestly kind of baffles me. The newborns I can understand, but I don't really understand how a red fox of all things managed to kill multiple (unspecified how many) adult ungulates weighing about 28 kg.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Oct 8, 2023 18:29:42 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Exalt on Oct 8, 2023 18:52:11 GMT 5
This seems like a thread I may be able to make use of...
Yeah, I have no idea how a fox is supposed to kill something that big, and multiple times in a night...
|
|
|
Post by Exalt on Oct 11, 2023 2:46:45 GMT 5
Today I learned, thanks n part to Infinity Blade, that there is a dinosaur named Dryptosaurus.
|
|
|
Post by Exalt on Oct 12, 2023 2:34:38 GMT 5
Today I learned that today is National Fossil Day.
|
|
|
Post by Exalt on Oct 14, 2023 3:51:55 GMT 5
Technically this wasn't today, but the question popped into my head a day or two ago: How do they know that Dilophosaurus could spit venom? It turns out that those are entirely fictitious elements created for Jurassic Park. Of all of the criticisms of those movies from an accuracy standpoint, I wonder how I never heard this part...
EDIT: Why would you even spit venom to begin with?
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Oct 14, 2023 4:06:31 GMT 5
Technically this wasn't today, but the question popped into my head a day or two ago: How do they know that Dilophosaurus could spit venom? It turns out that those are entirely fictitious elements created for Jurassic Park. Of all of the criticisms of those movies from an accuracy standpoint, I wonder how I never heard this part...
EDIT: Why would you even spit venom to begin with?
Spitting venom likely evolved three separate times in snakes. Snakes with this ability will aim their venom directly into the eyes of their attackers, allowing them to effectively cause pain (maybe worth noting at this point that spitting cobra venom doesn't look like the black goo the JP Dilophosaurus shot out). Dilophosaurus was originally thought to have had jaws and teeth that were weak for hunting, so there were proposals that instead it killed prey with its claws (on both hands and feet), that it was a scavenger, or that it fed on fish (although, that last one was proposed more from the fact that Dilophosaurus supposedly exhibits some piscivorous adaptations in its jaws & teeth). I believe when Crichton was writing the original JP novel, he took some liberties and gave Dilophosaurus that venom-spitting ability as a means to explain how it killed its prey. Now, we now know that this isn't true ( Dilophosaurus' skull and teeth were, in fact, formidable enough to kill large contemporaneous prey), but for the longest time this was people's impression of Dilophosaurus.
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Oct 14, 2023 7:11:11 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Exalt on Oct 14, 2023 7:54:40 GMT 5
Technically this wasn't today, but the question popped into my head a day or two ago: How do they know that Dilophosaurus could spit venom? It turns out that those are entirely fictitious elements created for Jurassic Park. Of all of the criticisms of those movies from an accuracy standpoint, I wonder how I never heard this part...
EDIT: Why would you even spit venom to begin with?
Spitting venom likely evolved three separate times in snakes. Snakes with this ability will aim their venom directly into the eyes of their attackers, allowing them to effectively cause pain (maybe worth noting at this point that spitting cobra venom doesn't look like the black goo the JP Dilophosaurus shot out). Dilophosaurus was originally thought to have had jaws and teeth that were weak for hunting, so there were proposals that instead it killed prey with its claws (on both hands and feet), that it was a scavenger, or that it fed on fish (although, that last one was proposed more from the fact that Dilophosaurus supposedly exhibits some piscivorous adaptations in its jaws & teeth). I believe when Crichton was writing the original JP novel, he took some liberties and gave Dilophosaurus that venom-spitting ability as a means to explain how it killed its prey. Now, we now know that this isn't true ( Dilophosaurus' skull and teeth were, in fact, formidable enough to kill large contemporaneous prey), but for the longest time this was people's impression of Dilophosaurus. I forgot about snakes doing it arghhhh I knew I was forgetting something.
|
|