blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Jun 23, 2014 23:06:32 GMT 5
You had already linked to Nima's Brachiosaurus or the 2m Apatosaurus femur?
Regarding Paul, I just noticed that he did include specimen number, over the measurements of the scapulacoracoid there's a bolded "5001" just sitting there not related to any of the measurements, this is the number of the scapulacoracoid in Jensen's usage, BYU 5001, over the tallest dorsal part we find another bolded number, "5000", again this is the number of the BYU dorsal that Paul thought was an anterior dorsal of B. altithorax, in fact BYU 5000 is the type specimen of Ultrasauros and this same vertebrae was later demonstrated by Curtice et al. (1996) to be a posterior dorsal of Supersaurus. If you pay attention to the table you find that he did this several times too with G. brancai, shoehorning HMN XV1 into the column of HMN Y or HM D into that of HM Ki24 or HMN J into HMN SA9, probably for the purpose of saving space.
It's not that one, BYU 4744 is a posterior dorsal, left ilium, left radius and right metacarpal 2 and a rib (?) and they come from Potter Creek not Recapture Creek.
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Jun 24, 2014 2:28:22 GMT 5
Nima’s Brachiosaurus. Where is BYU 4744 described?
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Jun 24, 2014 3:03:22 GMT 5
In this paper:
Jensen, J. A. 1987. New brachiosaur material from the Late Jurassic of Utah and Colorado. Great Basin Naturalist 47:592–608.
|
|
Fragillimus335
Member
Sauropod fanatic, and dinosaur specialist
Posts: 573
|
Post by Fragillimus335 on Aug 4, 2014 9:16:45 GMT 5
Jeez, Brachiosaurus was huge… ~29 meters long…That sneaky sauropod. If you assume 35 tons for the Holotype 24.5 meter specimen, the big boys might have weighed 55+ tons. Apatosaurus also seems like it just keeps growing. The oklahoma giant being <80% grown! That beast would be 35 meters long as an adult! Probably an 80 ton diplodocid...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2014 21:34:48 GMT 5
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Sept 4, 2014 21:49:16 GMT 5
Which ones? the operating empty weight of the Boing 737 nextgen varies between 36 and 45 tonnes, older models could have been as light as 28 tonnes.
None of the bones are exceptional in length but they are thick indeed, humerus and femur circumference are 785mm and 910mm respectively, the only published sauropods with thicker limb bones appear to be Brachiosaurus altithorax and Argentiosaurus for the femur. It soundly beats Paralititan and Futalongkosaurus in comparable measurements.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2014 22:02:43 GMT 5
Which ones? the operating empty weight of the Boing 737 nextgen varies between 36 and 45 tonnes, older models could have been as light as 28 tonnes. None of the bones are exceptional in length but they are thick indeed, humerus and femur circumference are 785mm and 910mm respectively, the only published sauropods with thicker limb bones appear to be Brachiosaurus altithorax and Argentiosaurus for the femur. It soundly beats Paralititan and Futalongkosaurus in comparable measurements. Claims like the ones saying it isn't fully grown yet. I wonder if that's a media fabrication or if it's real. We only have the abstracts for the papers...
|
|
Fragillimus335
Member
Sauropod fanatic, and dinosaur specialist
Posts: 573
|
Post by Fragillimus335 on Sept 4, 2014 22:15:40 GMT 5
Sounds cool, pretty heavy for an animal with a femur that looks to be under 2 meters long!
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Sept 4, 2014 23:15:07 GMT 5
We don't only have the abstracts of the paper, its open access!
From the description paper:
And yes, the femur is 191cm long.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2014 23:47:22 GMT 5
We don't only have the abstracts of the paper, its open access! From the description paper: And yes, the femur is 191cm long. Oh, seems like the media actually got it right. I couldn't find the paper on google scholar, all I can find is those two abstracts we had a while back.
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Sept 5, 2014 0:10:47 GMT 5
A 60 t subadult, wow!
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Sept 5, 2014 0:52:42 GMT 5
Imagine an adult...it seems this fellow lived up to his name.
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Sept 5, 2014 1:24:10 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Sept 5, 2014 3:32:07 GMT 5
Why are you people so surprised? Most dinosaurs were still growing at the time of death (Myhrvold 2013). It’s not always explicitely noted (obviously lots of them aren’t even complete enough for it to be readily apparent), that’s all. Case in point, there is no confirmed osteologically mature specimen of none less than Allosaurus, although there are candidates (Bypee et al. 2006). Signs of skeletal immaturity are typically only noted if they are particularly obvious (i.e. if the animal is either a real subadult with readily-apparent non-fusion throughout the skeleton, or if it happens to be from a study that examined limb-bone histology).
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Sept 5, 2014 17:12:02 GMT 5
I remember that Apatosaurus case, I was simply impressed because we now have a dinosaur from a very weight level where we know this and where it got noted.
|
|