gigadino96
Junior Member
Vi ravviso, o luoghi ameni
Posts: 226
|
Post by gigadino96 on Sept 8, 2016 3:25:19 GMT 5
I want to marry you creature386 only because you used the word fora in the OP. Really, I love you. Anyway: Whether dinosaurs were in decline before their final extinction 66 Mya has been debated for decades with no clear resolution. This dispute has not been resolved because of inappropriate data and methods. Here, for the first time to our knowledge, we apply a statistical approach that models changes in speciation and extinction through time. We find overwhelming support for a long-term decline across all dinosaurs and within all three major dinosaur groups. Our results highlight that dinosaurs showed a marked reduction in their ability to replace extinct species with new ones, making them vulnerable to extinction and unable to respond quickly to and recover from the final catastrophic event 66 Mya. www.pnas.org/content/113/18/5036.abstractI was actually interested in that, since I'm getting interested in K-Pg event. Or that was just an excuse to say that I love creature for his use of the word fora. Who knows?
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Sept 8, 2016 3:51:54 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Ceratodromeus on Sept 8, 2016 7:04:33 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Sept 10, 2016 18:18:17 GMT 5
gigadino96 and creature386There is a scientist who has expressed some sort of dissent over that recent study's conclusions. I thought it would be appropriate to put it here. linkEdit: to further add to this, blaze actually made another point about how the study defines success several months ago.
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Sept 16, 2016 16:19:38 GMT 5
Since we lack a Psittacosaurus profile, I'll post this here: www.cell.com/pb-assets/journals/research/current-biology/S200backup/vinther.pdfNew pigment evidence gives us information about Psittacosaurus' body colors. The body is darker on the back and on the sides than on the belly, this is quite common in modern animals and helps with camouflage by producing a countershading effect (the Sun makes objects brighter on the top than below, but by having a naturally darker back than belly, this effect can be defied).
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Sept 20, 2016 23:08:47 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Ceratodromeus on Oct 4, 2016 5:04:28 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Oct 9, 2016 16:21:38 GMT 5
Our understanding of the conquest of land may need to be revised: www.livescience.com/56011-early-tetrapod-lived-in-water.htmlKnown Acanthostega specimens may have represented juveniles. Adults may have been a lot more terrestrial than them. This (together with tetrapod footprints from Poland which are about 390 million years old) imo supports the view that tetrapods are older than we thought.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Oct 9, 2016 19:06:57 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Ceratodromeus on Oct 10, 2016 4:26:50 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Oct 22, 2016 17:54:44 GMT 5
A Carnivora member named micrompciraptor found this. New otodontid named Megalolamna. The study also concluded that "members of the megatoothed lineage, including ' megalodon', ought to be classified into the genus Otodus, and not to its traditional genus Carcharocles" ( link). Edit: Never mind, I just found out it's already in the profile. Though, I guess if you weren't aware before, you are now.
|
|
|
Post by Ceratodromeus on Nov 11, 2016 5:52:38 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Ceratodromeus on Nov 12, 2016 7:05:05 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Nov 14, 2016 7:16:45 GMT 5
Machairodus horribilis; an apparently 405 kilogram saber toothed cat ( link).
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Nov 18, 2016 19:18:02 GMT 5
|
|