|
|
Post by DinosaurMichael on May 31, 2013 20:22:58 GMT 5
No, I just meant I don't have to post stuff about the matchup to make a comment on something that is posted about the animal. In general, not here. It's just my resolution not to debate about such fight-scenarios the way I and others do on carnivora. Oh. So you want to discuss about it on a another thread then? If so. It's not a problem. |
|
|
|
Post by theropod on May 31, 2013 20:27:33 GMT 5
This thread is OK.
|
|
|
|
Post by DinosaurMichael on May 31, 2013 20:36:07 GMT 5
Alright, but don't you think it's getting off topic. This thread is about who would win in this fight after all. |
|
|
|
Post by theropod on May 31, 2013 20:56:23 GMT 5
how large the two of them are is relevant to a fight, isn't it? I think it is pretty save to say Ceratosaurus is larger.
|
|
|
|
Post by DinosaurMichael on May 31, 2013 23:34:02 GMT 5
how large the two of them are is relevant to a fight, isn't it? I think it is pretty save to say Ceratosaurus is larger. Yes it is now that you say it and from everything you said. Yeah Ceratosaurus would of been much bigger. |
|
Dakotaraptor
Junior Member
Used to be Metriacanthosaurus
Posts: 193 
|
Post by Dakotaraptor on Aug 11, 2013 22:03:19 GMT 5
Ceratosaurus nasicornis being much heavier? Maybe not, unless there is possible C. dentisulcatus holotype was its more mature form like some think.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2018 8:55:27 GMT 5
This seems like a 50/50.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Feb 12, 2019 21:49:52 GMT 5
Ceratosaurus wins, it's larger and has far deadlier weaponry
|
|
