|
|
Post by creature386 on Nov 15, 2019 23:33:20 GMT 5
Is it because of scientific inaccuracy? I'm asking because I'm planning to make a thread about that sort of topic.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Nov 16, 2019 0:04:18 GMT 5
Well, the primary issue I take with that is the DIRECTION the inaccuracy went in. I mean yeah, as inaccurate as it is, Indominus Rex is very cool. As is Indoraptor.
But T rexes that are kind to Apatosaurus? An eccentric Styracosaurus? And all of them doing super-unrealistic sappy anthrophomorphic things?
Nope. THAT's the problem.
|
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Nov 16, 2019 0:13:06 GMT 5
So, does that mean you have a problem with Land Before Time, too?
I mean, these anthropomorphic talking animals are a staple of children's entertainment.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Nov 16, 2019 0:15:46 GMT 5
No, in fact LBT is quite a good movie. The degrees of ridiculousness and sappiness between the 2 movies are NOTHING alike.
|
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Nov 16, 2019 0:34:04 GMT 5
They are pretty similar in terms of realism.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Nov 16, 2019 0:41:46 GMT 5
Not quite. The Good Dinosaur goes a whole level further with sappy stuff and crazy but not entertaining stuff, like very eccentric dinos, dinosaur farmers, cavemen, etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Nov 16, 2019 0:46:20 GMT 5
Well it’s a little funny to rate children’s movies with talking dinosaurs on their accuracy, isn’t it?
Isn’t there a threshhold beyond which it’s clear it doesn’t really matter any more? Like once you have talking dinosaurs, does it really matter whether they are farmers, or "eccentric"? Why are talking dinosaurs ok, but talking and farming dinosaurs are a big no-no?
|
|
|
|
Post by ultimatium35 on Nov 17, 2019 10:34:09 GMT 5
A good portion of MCU movies
No offense to any fans here.
|
|
