blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Aug 29, 2013 4:14:03 GMT 5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2013 5:50:21 GMT 5
Thanks! It seems like Estemmnosuchus has the bulk and bite to take this eland down.
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Aug 29, 2013 6:49:18 GMT 5
No problem, it's hard to find data on russian taxa, specially if you don't speak russian (which I don't) btw have you noticed that according to "the internet" all large dinocephalians are 4-5m long? haha
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2013 18:33:29 GMT 5
No problem, it's hard to find data on russian taxa, specially if you don't speak russian (which I don't) btw have you noticed that according to "the internet" all large dinocephalians are 4-5m long? haha Yeah, it seems like they just copied the length figures from Moschops or something. In reality, only Moschops and Tapinocephalus(assuming that it had Moschops' skull-to-body ratio) are at that length, as far as I know.
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Aug 29, 2013 18:37:36 GMT 5
blazeIf you don't speak Russian, did you have to google translate the whole text dealing with Estemmenosuchidae to find something?
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Aug 29, 2013 22:22:41 GMT 5
I did google translate it haha but I was already familiar with the format of that book when I searched for info on Inostrancevia, I knew what to translate first, just below the family name it says from where is endemic and from how many genera is known and in this case, it says it's only known from Estemmenosuchus, meaning that the rest of the text is all for Estemmenosuchus, on top of that the units are barely different (65CM/3M instead of 65cm/3m) so it wasn't that hard to find a section of the text dealing with its size.
edit: broly, probably not even them, I'm reading "Gregory. 1926. The skeleton of Moschops capensis Broom, a dinocephalian reptile from the Permian of South Africa." Of the three partial skeletons recovered (there were also fragmentary remains of at least other 4 individuals), the "mid size" skeleton which was mounted, is said to have an axial length of ~2.7m, there's another skeleton though, bigger than it, but it doesn't seem to be much bigger, the humerus and femur are only ~6% longer, indicating a total length of ~2.9m. In respect to Tapinocephalus, the skull of the midsize specimen of Moschops is 42cm in greatest length, Gregory (1926) says that the largest skull of Tapinocephalus is 53cm in greatest length, assuming isometry, that'll make the largest Tapinocephalus known (at the time and apparently still the biggest 30 years later, Boonstra 1956) just 3.4m long.
But who knows, this papers are over 50 years old, maybe there were bigger specimens found?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2013 1:02:27 GMT 5
The Estemmnosuchus wouldn't have much problems charging at the eland and crushing it.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Mar 2, 2014 7:37:46 GMT 5
The eland is absolutely not winning this. Its build is badly outmatched by that of Estemmenosuchus, both in terms of the torso and its appendicular anatomy; I can imagine the dinocephalian easily knocking the bovid to the ground and dispatching it. Estemmenosuchus' weaponry is also much more impressive; it has a big, robust skull filled with sharp canines and incisors and, as a dinocephalian, could headbutt the eland with its thickened skull roof and horns. The eland has horns that can be effective weapons if used correctly, but it also has a relatively small head that definitely isn't going to cut it against the head and mouth of Estemmenosuchus.
Estemmenosuchus wins easily.
|
|
Carcharodon
Junior Member
Allosauroidea Enthusiast
Posts: 211
|
Post by Carcharodon on Mar 2, 2014 7:54:56 GMT 5
If this was around at parity, estemmenosuchus should win imo due to its bulk and has the bite to kill the eland.
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Mar 2, 2014 9:41:43 GMT 5
Infinity BladeThe specimen with the 65cm long skull probably approached 700kg.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Mar 2, 2014 10:11:47 GMT 5
Thanks blaze.
|
|
|
Post by An Goldish Jade on Aug 15, 2017 14:08:42 GMT 5
around the same size, the Estemmenosuchus would win, its jaw are impressive weaponry, and its robust body, can let it survive the horns of eland.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2018 9:53:01 GMT 5
SO at parity then, the Esetemmeno would win.
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Feb 3, 2019 21:44:31 GMT 5
Estemmenosuchus wins comfortably
|
|