|
Post by Ceratodromeus on Jan 24, 2020 0:25:57 GMT 5
Once again, just because you don't like how this thread is faring for you, doesn't mean it is "flaring up". Concede the point, or don't reply, but dont make these kinds of asinine comments.
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jan 24, 2020 0:30:52 GMT 5
I'm referring to how off-topic and heated some of the comments were getting, and this is part of it as well - we're not exactly discussing the match, are we?
|
|
|
Post by Ceratodromeus on Jan 24, 2020 0:32:30 GMT 5
We are discussing your inane ability to not form a proper argument and habits that you've now demonstrated between threads. Pertinent.
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jan 24, 2020 0:38:48 GMT 5
I've given my arguments for density and mass as best I could. If you don't like them, just ignore them!
|
|
|
Post by Ceratodromeus on Jan 24, 2020 0:42:32 GMT 5
thats's something you need to learn, saying "im not replying" isn't ignoring them, btw. You're still acknowleding it is there, you just refuse to reply for an improper argumenative reason.
Go directly quote me saying anything about them once in this thread.
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Jan 24, 2020 0:43:23 GMT 5
I'm not sure if dinosauria is all that interested in debating in general, honestly. Sure, he posts a lot in these threads. But the priority always seems to be to tell the world whatever thoughts are currently occupying him.
To make one thing clear, I also made this post just because I had a quick thought I wanted to share with the world. However, when a desire to share intrusive thoughts becomes so strong that it overrides all other desires (like avoiding criticism), it might reach the point of an obsession. This is nothing one should be ashamed of, but one should be aware.
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jan 24, 2020 0:48:13 GMT 5
I'm not sure if dinosauria is all that interested in debating in general, honestly I am. What I don't like is these threads going waaaaay off-topic like this.
|
|
|
Post by Ceratodromeus on Jan 24, 2020 0:51:27 GMT 5
There is nothing off topic about a criticism of your argument and diversion in the thread.
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jan 24, 2020 0:57:14 GMT 5
What's even being critisized? That I chose to ignore something (that I have no idea what it says) because I have no argument for it?
|
|
|
Post by Ceratodromeus on Jan 24, 2020 0:59:11 GMT 5
What's even being critisized? That I chose to ignore something (that I have no idea what it says) because I have no argument for it? Actually read what has been said before you reply to me again. I am not repeating myself.
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jan 24, 2020 1:18:56 GMT 5
That's what I could glean from your comment.
But whatever, this is getting very off topic. Anyone care to discuss the actual matchup?
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Jan 24, 2020 3:04:21 GMT 5
We're still not really off topic. Now, if people would rather discuss the fight at similar weights, they can be my guest. But ultimately everything in this page goes back to the discussion on comparative body mass, which, understandably, is seen as a rather big aspect of this thread's topic.
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jan 24, 2020 4:01:44 GMT 5
I think parity is probably 50/50 with an edge to Giganotosaurus
|
|
|
Post by Ceratodromeus on Jan 24, 2020 23:40:37 GMT 5
That's what I could glean from your comment. But whatever, this is getting very off topic. Anyone care to discuss the actual matchup? Why would they want to do that, with someone who time and again doesn't form a proper rebuttal and tries to divert from criticism he has received by calling it "off topic"? what i have said is not very hard to understand, and at this point i can only think that you are deliberately trying to not get what is being said. And like Infinity blade said, it is not off topic. You simply failed to divert attention from the subject of your poor argument structure again.
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jan 24, 2020 23:58:13 GMT 5
That's what I could glean from your comment. But whatever, this is getting very off topic. Anyone care to discuss the actual matchup? Why would they want to do that, with someone who time and again doesn't form a proper rebuttal and tries to divert from criticism he has received by calling it "off topic"? what i have said is not very hard to understand, and at this point i can only think that you are deliberately trying to not get what is being said. And like Infinity blade said, it is not off topic. You simply failed to divert attention from the subject of your poor argument structure again. I have given my rebuttal for the density thing now, and am no longer using 'averages'.
|
|