|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jan 21, 2020 3:55:42 GMT 5
Well, it would still be a bit faster. However, I'd imagine as the water gives less and less area up and down, the crocs would have more advantage. If you have to take an animal out of its element (the open ocean) to make it a fair fight, then maybe the scenario isn't a good one. I wouldn't really call it out of its element. Would just give more mobility to the crocs, relatively speaking. And it would still be close. |
|
|
|
Post by kekistani on Jan 21, 2020 4:19:36 GMT 5
If you have to take an animal out of its element (the open ocean) to make it a fair fight, then maybe the scenario isn't a good one. I wouldn't really call it out of its element. Would just give more mobility to the crocs, relatively speaking. And it would still be close. It is out of its element. The Shark is an open-ocean blitzer, not a shallow-water blitzer. If you wanted a good shark v crocodile fight in shallow water you probably should have gone with the tiger shark. |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jan 21, 2020 4:21:46 GMT 5
I wouldn't really call it out of its element. Would just give more mobility to the crocs, relatively speaking. And it would still be close. It is out of its element. The Shark is an open-ocean blitzer, not a shallow-water blitzer. If you wanted a good shark v crocodile fight in shallow water you probably should have gone with the tiger shark. I think that that's a viable match for tomorrow. But again, this is neither a mismatch in shallow nor deep water - the other party still very much has what it takes to win. Just not more often than not. |
|
|
|
Post by kekistani on Jan 21, 2020 5:09:42 GMT 5
It is out of its element. The Shark is an open-ocean blitzer, not a shallow-water blitzer. If you wanted a good shark v crocodile fight in shallow water you probably should have gone with the tiger shark. I think that that's a viable match for tomorrow. But again, this is neither a mismatch in shallow nor deep water - the other party still very much has what it takes to win. Just not more often than not. Never said it was a mismatch. I just said the Mako easily wins. |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jan 21, 2020 5:10:38 GMT 5
I think that that's a viable match for tomorrow. But again, this is neither a mismatch in shallow nor deep water - the other party still very much has what it takes to win. Just not more often than not. Never said it was a mismatch. I just said the Mako easily wins. My bad. I meant not onesided or easy |
|
|
|
Post by Ceratodromeus on Jan 22, 2020 9:50:45 GMT 5
This doesn't end in any good way for the crocodiles at all. This is also not even sympatric.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jan 22, 2020 16:19:10 GMT 5
It isn't? Oh.
Shoot.
|
|
