|
Post by creature386 on Feb 11, 2014 22:39:12 GMT 5
As for your last line, you don't need to repeat what broly said…
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Feb 11, 2014 23:05:21 GMT 5
I think I just will agree to disagree regarding the two pieces of snout, just one comment, the lower toothrow being 70% the length, that's the point, it doesn't fit in more than one dimension at a time. In Arizonasaurus the centrum is also of similar in shape, I've searched for anterior/posterior photos but I haven't found any, it might be or it might be not that that reconstruction is good @broly I agree on that, if it was a wide ridge, a little more wide than the transverse processes is probably the max.
|
|
Fragillimus335
Member
Sauropod fanatic, and dinosaur specialist
Posts: 573
|
Post by Fragillimus335 on Feb 12, 2014 0:53:25 GMT 5
Arizonasaurus's vertebra look dashingly similar to those of Spinosaurus…
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Feb 12, 2014 0:59:29 GMT 5
Indeed. The spine seems similar in width, and even the proportions of the neural arch and centrum are comparable.
Where’s that image from?
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Feb 12, 2014 1:24:47 GMT 5
I want to know too.
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Feb 12, 2014 1:41:14 GMT 5
I could not find anything with google, is that maybe your own comparison?
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Feb 12, 2014 14:36:21 GMT 5
Even if it was, someone must have made and published those photographs of Arizonasaurus.
Edit: I guess it’s from "Osteology of the Middle Triassic pseudosuchian archosaur Arizonasaurus babbitti" (Nesbitt 2005). Unfortunately I cannot find an accessible version anywhere.
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Feb 14, 2014 15:41:56 GMT 5
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Mar 6, 2014 7:14:09 GMT 5
I found something interesting in the references of a recent paper.
Dalman, S.G. and S.G. Lucas. A new large Tyrannosaurid Alamotyrannus brinkmani, n. gen., n. sp. (Theropoda: Tyrannosauridae), from the Upper Cretaceous Ojo Alamo Formation (Naashoibito Member), San Juan Basin, New Mexico. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin. In press.
Google search turns up with only two results for "Alamotyrannus" so this paper is still unpublished and when it gets published it's probably going to get a lot of press over being a new large Tyrannosaurid that "lived alongside T. rex" HA! this new taxon is probably the supposed Tyrannosaurus species that lived with Alamosaurus, might be ancestral to Tyrannosaurus though.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Mar 6, 2014 7:18:00 GMT 5
By large, do they mean up there with T.rex and the others in size?
|
|
Fragillimus335
Member
Sauropod fanatic, and dinosaur specialist
Posts: 573
|
Post by Fragillimus335 on Mar 6, 2014 8:01:21 GMT 5
Even if it was, someone must have made and published those photographs of Arizonasaurus. Edit: I guess it’s from "Osteology of the Middle Triassic pseudosuchian archosaur Arizonasaurus babbitti" (Nesbitt 2005). Unfortunately I cannot find an accessible version anywhere. Yes it is, sorry about not responding earlier!
|
|
Fragillimus335
Member
Sauropod fanatic, and dinosaur specialist
Posts: 573
|
Post by Fragillimus335 on Mar 6, 2014 8:11:26 GMT 5
I found something interesting in the references of a recent paper. Dalman, S.G. and S.G. Lucas. A new large Tyrannosaurid Alamotyrannus brinkmani, n. gen., n. sp. (Theropoda: Tyrannosauridae), from the Upper Cretaceous Ojo Alamo Formation (Naashoibito Member), San Juan Basin, New Mexico. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin. In press. Google search turns up with only two results for "Alamotyrannus" so this paper is still unpublished and when it gets published it's probably going to get a lot of press over being a new large Tyrannosaurid that "lived alongside T. rex" HA! this new taxon is probably the supposed Tyrannosaurus species that lived with Alamosaurus, might be ancestral to Tyrannosaurus though. Awesome. That is all.
|
|
Fragillimus335
Member
Sauropod fanatic, and dinosaur specialist
Posts: 573
|
Post by Fragillimus335 on Mar 6, 2014 8:12:08 GMT 5
I can confirm it's figure 19 of that paper, theropod. Also I want to share this, it's from 2012 and it's very brief but linkand another New giant theropod ichnotaxonCurse them! Not including the adult Spinosaur dentary picture!!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2014 8:56:10 GMT 5
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Mar 6, 2014 9:11:24 GMT 5
Infinity BladeI don't know, maybe, the paper that had that reference is Dalman (2013) "New Examples of Tyrannosaurus rex from the Lance Formation of Wyoming, United States" and this is what it says that is cited with the Alamotyrannus paper: I guess will have to wait for the paper to be published. Fragillimus335I thought the same haha. @brolyeuphyfusion They estimated the weight using Therrien and Henderson (2007) equation but yes, a 115cm long skull corresponds to a length approaching 10m based on Hartman's skeletal but is probably closer to 9.5m as his skeletal scaled to have a skull 120cm long is 9.8m long. Edit: Might not be giant enough but it could be a giant for its group. Giant oviraptor tracks from hell creek
|
|