|
Post by Grey on Dec 6, 2013 0:03:47 GMT 5
Cretoxyrhina could be a good basis but I have several rigorous skeletal models of C. megalodon. They are all based on Gottfried et al. This chondocranium reproduction. This model of the Calvert Museum skeleton : Regarding Zygo, the best I have is this : And that reconstruction from the Lima exhibit :
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Dec 6, 2013 0:17:39 GMT 5
What size would be good for it? I haven't really followed what is most agreed upon.
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Dec 6, 2013 0:22:31 GMT 5
What size would be good for it? I haven't really followed what is most agreed upon. To be fair, I would simply follow the actual published sizes for both. 13.5-14 m for Livyatan using a skeleton/body shape of Physeter, 16.2-17.5 m using a skeleton/body model of Zygophyseter. For meg, there is of course the conservative maximum by Gottfried 15.9 m TL and the maximum of 17 m. Using Shimada's method, Pimiento found teeth from two 17 m individuals and one at 17.9 m. Gottfried hypothesized a maximum size of 20.3 m TL. There are others rigorous estimates, based on jaws perimeter, but they are not properly published.
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Dec 6, 2013 3:52:11 GMT 5
I'm almost done with Livyatan (both Physeter and Zygophyseter based) but I realized, are whales measured in some special way? in the Zygophyseter drawing from the description paper it's 6.5m from tip of snout to tip of the tail fluke, I have it scaled like that but the Physeter based body was scaled measuring up to the middle of the tail fluke, about a meter shorter because I had in mind that that's where it's measured at but then I remember that that was for elephant seals not whales. Edit: I've found it, whales are measured tip of rostrum to notch of tail fluke, since I don't know what measurement the authors of Zygophyseter meant and their drawing shows an animal 6.5m in total length when scaled to the correct skull size I'll use the measurements as total length. Edit2: Livyatan size
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Dec 6, 2013 7:59:27 GMT 5
Blaze, that is spectacular, a top quality work. Of course the dorsal fin is speculative but no doubt whatever its precise size, this creature was certainly epic, and terrifying to observe attacking.
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Dec 6, 2013 8:36:33 GMT 5
Thank you haha, indeed.
The dorsal fin... I just left it there from the reconstruction of Zygophyseter lol
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Dec 6, 2013 8:43:58 GMT 5
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Dec 6, 2013 12:10:42 GMT 5
Carcharocles megalodon and Livyatan compared
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Dec 6, 2013 12:15:48 GMT 5
Excellent, epic work as I expected. Congratulations. I think that's the best comparisons of the whole animals I've seen yet.
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Dec 6, 2013 13:15:40 GMT 5
Really? I'm flattered Here it is the Megalodon only size chart that you requested.
|
|
|
Post by Life on Dec 6, 2013 21:02:14 GMT 5
Excellent work, blaze. You have artistic talent.
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Dec 9, 2013 8:00:12 GMT 5
I prefer to think I give myself a lot of free time, I really can't draw live animals to save my life. lol
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Dec 13, 2013 18:17:15 GMT 5
Not all Mamenchisaurus are the same.
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Dec 14, 2013 14:06:30 GMT 5
|
|
gigadino96
Junior Member
Vi ravviso, o luoghi ameni
Posts: 226
|
Post by gigadino96 on Dec 14, 2013 21:30:20 GMT 5
Here's a T.rex-Spinosaurus comparison according to Cau (made by Cau) Though I'm not completely agree with him.
|
|