|
|
Post by spartan on Jul 28, 2019 21:25:15 GMT 5
 ^Is that Triceratops or the related species (can't recall the name, that is slightly larger)? Are you referring to Torosaurus or Eotriceratops when you say 'related species'? Toro is the same size as Trike, but Eotrike is much, MUCH bigger (12 meters and 30 tons by scaling up from Triceratops) Since when is Eotriceratops 12m and 30t? |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jul 28, 2019 21:35:27 GMT 5
Are you referring to Torosaurus or Eotriceratops when you say 'related species'? Toro is the same size as Trike, but Eotrike is much, MUCH bigger (12 meters and 30 tons by scaling up from Triceratops) Since when is Eotriceratops 12m and 30t? Scaling up from Triceratops done by brolyeuphyfusion on the old Carnivora's Eotriceratops vs T rex thread |
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Jul 29, 2019 3:10:47 GMT 5
This was based on a footprint, wasn't it? Sounds like too weak evidence to state it in such a matter-of-factly way.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jul 29, 2019 3:15:25 GMT 5
No, that was Ceratopsipes.
Eotriceratops has a skull that fits the size of 12 meter Triceratops. Unfortunately, since we are both banned from the archives, there's no verifying broly's post, but 12 meters is quite common Eotrike size estimate
|
|
|
|
Post by spartan on Jul 29, 2019 15:05:13 GMT 5
Do you have a reliable source for such estimates? A 30t ceratopsian is a very bold claim.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jul 29, 2019 15:47:29 GMT 5
spartan
It's just scaling up to match skull proportions. I'm not sure what you mean by 'reliable source'.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jul 29, 2019 17:08:41 GMT 5
Mapusaurus vs Spinosaurus (I could put it in the thread)  |
|
|
|
Post by spartan on Jul 30, 2019 6:09:31 GMT 5
spartan It's just scaling up to match skull proportions. I'm not sure what you mean by 'reliable source'. But which specimen? Because the holotype with the 3m skull has been estimated at 8.5-9m and 10t. |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jul 30, 2019 9:08:17 GMT 5
spartan It's just scaling up to match skull proportions. I'm not sure what you mean by 'reliable source'. But which specimen? Because the holotype with the 3m skull has been estimated at 8.5-9m and 10t. The skull you mentioned. The largest Triceratops, the 9-10 meter, 12 ton specimen, has a 2.5 meter skull. Going by that, the 12 meter Eotriceratops sounds rather plausible |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jul 30, 2019 16:08:12 GMT 5
 Archaeotherium vs Giganotosaurus - max size, made by me (open in new tab for larger resolution |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jul 30, 2019 18:12:03 GMT 5
 American mastodon vs Mapusaurus - average vs average, made by me |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jul 31, 2019 14:03:00 GMT 5
Giganotosaurus vs Therizinosaurus (made by me, max size)  |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jul 31, 2019 14:48:13 GMT 5
Elasmotherium vs Triceratops (made by me, max size)  |
|
|
|
Post by jdangerousdinosaur on Aug 1, 2019 2:43:27 GMT 5
T.rex with Acro from Quora  |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Aug 1, 2019 9:06:18 GMT 5
Palaeoloxodon namadicus vs 3 Mapusaurus  NOTE: The elephant is maximum sized while the carnosaurs are only average. This is because I could not accurately scale them to the dimensions of MCF-PVPH-108.145, the 13.6 meter, 8.5 ton specimen |
|
