blaze
Paleo-artist 
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on May 28, 2014 3:18:56 GMT 5
If I remember correctly, PeerJ already has the review process of a paper open to the public.
|
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on May 28, 2014 17:48:23 GMT 5
That site looks very promising. If that concept works out it will all be much faster, more acessible and more democratic than in traditional publishing. Also being able to actually observe reviews and corrections made to a paper could be instructive. On the other hand, there has to be some sort of control, otherwise I imagine there would soon be a big bunch of spam. I’m very curious. Same here. I am curious how this section will look in some weeks: thewinnower.com/topics/paleontology |
|
|
|
Post by theropod on May 28, 2014 18:28:05 GMT 5
If I remember correctly, PeerJ already has the review process of a paper open to the public. Really? That’s great, where can they be found? |
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on May 29, 2014 0:59:40 GMT 5
Go to any paper on PeerJ, on the navigation bar on the left side there's also a "Peer review history", for example this one |
|
|
|
Post by Ceratodromeus on Jan 11, 2016 3:41:26 GMT 5
The American society of Mammology has some pretty great species accounts , here's a link(click it). |
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on May 15, 2017 22:07:04 GMT 5
|
|
