Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2013 12:11:28 GMT 5
As most people use the "infinity" argument, what about limiting to the observable universe (diameter of 93 billion light years)? Still far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far too large for Earth to be alone. You can't even grasp how large 93,000,000,000 light years is.
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Jun 26, 2013 13:20:04 GMT 5
I can't even grasp how large the distance between Proxima Centauri and our sun is.
|
|
LeopJag
Member
Panthera kryptikos (cryptic, evasive panther)
Posts: 440
|
Post by LeopJag on Sept 12, 2013 8:48:59 GMT 5
Life on this planet maybe of extraterrestrial origin... Does Life on Earth Come from Mars?We’ve all heard the theory that life on Earth originated on Mars, but now there is fresh evidence to support it. New research presented at a recent scientific conference suggests that the Red Planet was actually a much better place for life billions of years ago and therefore the very likely source of the first living cells that appeared on Earth. The theory was presented at the Westheimer Institute for Science and Technology by Professor Steven Benner. According to generally accepted theory, life appeared on Earth 3.5 billion years ago as the planet began to cool down. The drop in temperatures allowed the formation of simple organic compounds, which then combined into polymers and eventually became the first protocells. Evidence suggests that these first cells used RNA replication and that life forms switched to DNA replication a lot later. But according to Benner, this theory of RNA replication does not hold, as the process would have been very rare if Earth was indeed submerged in water back then. The formation of RNA requires two essential components: borate and molybdate and if these are absent, organic molecules dissolved in water result in tar instead of RNA. But both borate and molybdate would have been scarce on Earth billions of years ago. However, Benner says the minerals would have been abundant on Mars, something confirmed by the recent analysis of Martian meteorite. Scientists have collected and tested 120 Martian meteorites so far and most of them indicate that both catalysts needed for RNA replication were present on the Red Planet. Another element that further supports the theory is that water is corrosive to RNA, so replication would have been a lot more likely to happen on Mars, which had significantly less water than Earth did. According to banner, the most recent evidence adds extra weight to the theory that “we are actually all Martians” and that life on Earth actually started on the Red Planet and came here “on a rock.” While we are still a longs distance from seeing definitive proof of the actual origins of life, the latest discoveries give hope that we will eventually find life on Mars and other worlds. What do you think of the theory? Share your thoughts in the comments below! [Image via Telegraph] techbeat.com/2013/09/does-life-on-earth-come-from-mars/
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2013 23:39:16 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Dec 21, 2013 2:10:01 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Jan 6, 2014 23:42:02 GMT 5
Because I'm currently having a debate on carnivora on that subject, I would like to ask you a question: You all believe in extra terrestrial live, but does this only refer to micro organisms, or would you find extra terrestrial lifeforms comparable in size to ours plausible, too?
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Jul 16, 2015 22:34:32 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Nov 3, 2016 4:51:18 GMT 5
How likely do you think it is that alien life forms would evolve to look like humans? I'm not exactly the most well-versed on the topic, but this io9 article ( link) lists some ways that aliens could evolve to look like us (however, I object to the "convergent evolution" argument). Is the science there sound?
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Nov 3, 2016 18:28:10 GMT 5
*Moved it here because I wanted to revive my old alien thread.*
I'm happy that at least symmetry is likely to evolve independently because my SciFi story only has symmetric aliens… Anyway, independently evolving humanoid aliens are obviously implausible because you'd need a planet that's almost exactly like Earth with almost exactly the same history which we all know is fantastically improbable. Unless you are a proponent of the ancient astronauts hypothesis and claim, like Erich von Däniken did, that aliens created us in their image and hence look like us, but I hope noone here actually believes this.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 5, 2016 16:11:11 GMT 5
Humanoid aliens, as in simply having at least a passing resemblance to the basic primate form, aren't that implausible as you'll simply need the right evolutionary pressures to evolve a bipedal upright pose, which isn't necessarily the exact same as in ours.
Now, aliens which are simply human copies with slightly different features/additional features/different colors/etc., that's another story.
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Sept 23, 2017 23:31:55 GMT 5
Just finished reading this little first contact story by Eliezer Yudkowsky: robinhanson.typepad.com/files/three-worlds-collide.pdfThe aliens are REALLY alien. Both physiology and morality-wise. One race (called Babyeaters) consists of sentient crystalline, insectile creatures who eat their own children. The other one (called Superhappies) are basically hedonistic tentacles who communicate by having sex.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Sept 23, 2017 23:48:29 GMT 5
Like everyone else here I would be baffled if the rest of the universe was completely devoid of any life. When was the last time any of you have encountered someone who doesn't think alien life exists? I don't think I've ever.
However, when I think of plausible alien life I still typically think of microscopic, single-celled life akin to the first lifeforms of Earth. That's because I have no idea what alien animals (if they can even be called that) would be like.
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Sept 24, 2017 1:32:49 GMT 5
When was the last time any of you have encountered someone who doesn't think alien life exists? I don't think I've ever. There are some solutions to the Fermi paradox which propose something along these lines. Though technically, this solution would only entail that there are no other civilisations, not there there can't be some microbes on other planets.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Sept 24, 2017 10:16:26 GMT 5
When was the last time any of you have encountered someone who doesn't think alien life exists? I don't think I've ever. There are some solutions to the Fermi paradox which propose something along these lines. Though technically, this solution would only entail that there are no other civilisations, not there there can't be some microbes on other planets. That was a legitimate question. But I was unaware of your first statement.
|
|
|
Post by An Goldish Jade on Sept 24, 2017 17:46:47 GMT 5
I think that it is possible, somewhere out there in the galaxy, there is advanced lifeforms.
|
|