|
|
Post by kekistani on Feb 11, 2020 2:17:06 GMT 5
That wasn't the issue at all. What they took issue with was the 'redefining' of T rex vs Giganotosaurus. YOur posts with sauropod size were the main issue of conflict. Not to say the "redefinition" of T.rex vs Giganotosaurus was accurate, though. |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Feb 11, 2020 2:19:48 GMT 5
They were? Odd, most people on Reddit that I was aware of took zilch issue.
|
|
|
|
Post by kekistani on Feb 11, 2020 2:45:11 GMT 5
They were? Odd, most people on Reddit that I was aware of took zilch issue. Oh bloody hell, I just saw the post. Yep, NV, that's almost the stupidest thing i've seen. |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Feb 11, 2020 5:32:20 GMT 5
Take it as you will, but others seemed to like it.
|
|
|
|
Post by kekistani on Feb 11, 2020 6:41:23 GMT 5
Take it as you will, but others seemed to like it. "others seemed to like it"
22% upvotes, 0 of which are visible
Only comments are (well deserved) critiscism
Kek
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Feb 11, 2020 6:43:48 GMT 5
Maybe it wasn't a hit, but you and one other person are literally the only 2 people who took issue with the chart. The primary issue seems to be the mass estimate.
|
|
|
|
Post by kekistani on Feb 11, 2020 9:08:22 GMT 5
Maybe it wasn't a hit, but you and one other person are literally the only 2 people who took issue with the chart. The primary issue seems to be the mass estimate. "Only 2 people" Looks at comments from multiple other people and the 18% like-dislike ratio
and not just the mass issue, the fact you decided to use an immature T.rex with a fully grown giga is even more laughable
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Feb 11, 2020 10:00:18 GMT 5
I was referring to the Sauroposeidon thing I posted. And my bad, ONE person there did not like the comp. That's it.
As for the other one,
a) that's an adult
b) there is no data on the maturity of either specimen; they could be subadults for all we know.
|
|
|
|
Post by kekistani on Feb 11, 2020 10:49:00 GMT 5
I was referring to the Sauroposeidon thing I posted. And my bad, ONE person there did not like the comp. That's it. As for the other one, a) that's an adult b) there is no data on the maturity of either specimen; they could be subadults for all we know. "Sexually mature"=/= adult.
Occam's razor tells us they are probably adult. It is safe to assume so.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Feb 11, 2020 16:55:02 GMT 5
That's an adult, though not necessarily an old one.
And yes, we have been a priori assuming they were adults. Just thought I'd mention that, however.
|
|
|
|
Post by kekistani on Feb 11, 2020 20:23:33 GMT 5
That's an adult, though not necessarily an old one. And yes, we have been a priori assuming they were adults. Just thought I'd mention that, however. No, it's sexually mature, not fully grown. There is a difference. |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Feb 11, 2020 20:42:41 GMT 5
And it is therefore an adult.
|
|
|
|
Post by kekistani on Feb 11, 2020 22:55:56 GMT 5
And it is therefore an adult. No. Just...no. Teenagers as young as 14 are "Sexually mature", but nobody argues that they are adult. |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Feb 11, 2020 22:58:45 GMT 5
We do know, however, with T rex, that its growth slowed significantly from age 15-18, as is the case with B-rex who had pretty much stopped then.
|
|
|
|
Post by kekistani on Feb 11, 2020 23:38:53 GMT 5
We do know, however, with T rex, that its growth slowed significantly from age 15-18, as is the case with B-rex who had pretty much stopped then. Source that B.rex had stopped growing at this age and was not going to grow any further? |
|
