|
Post by dinosauria101 on Dec 19, 2019 19:47:28 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Dec 19, 2019 20:15:26 GMT 5
I think theropod defended the biology of Liaoningosaurus as proposed by Ji et al. (2016) once on this forum, but I don't know if he still holds those views. I also tried looking for that post a while back and couldn't find it, so I could very well be wrong. So, let's address this. First thing I want to say is that this ankylosaur was said to have had sharp, forked teeth. If we take this description at face value, then this is an adaptation for gripping fish, not slicing them. I also don't know if I would include tail osteoderms as some of its weapons; its preserved skeleton-> doesn't appear to show anything like that. But, maybe to make up for this, Liaoningosaurus was also said to possess long sharp claws on its hands and feet for prey capture by the aforementioned authors (I at least recovered the abstract->) Again, this depends on whether or not this...unique...interpretation of Liaoningosaurus holds any water.
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Dec 19, 2019 20:32:19 GMT 5
Hmm....interesting. I will have to update the OP.
If Liaoningosaurus was not a swimmer, this would have to be moved to the fantasy section.
|
|
|
Post by 6f5e4d on Dec 20, 2019 10:23:31 GMT 5
Liaoningosaurus can win this fight for sure, it would dominate the cookiecutter shark.
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Dec 20, 2019 18:54:31 GMT 5
Why do you think that would be? I agree the ankylosaur can win due to armor and fish hunting skills, but DOMINATING? Isn't that a bit much?
|
|