|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Dec 8, 2019 23:21:57 GMT 5
Sure, inquire/request away. That way we might get some size comparisons someone actually wants to see. I've always wanted to see size comparisons between a large dromaeosaur and a machairodont rival. For the longest time, I've thought about the JP raptors, and that bit of fantasy took a blow when I found out how small Velociraptors really were. It was only 3 years ago that I've heard about Dakotaraptor and Achillobator, and it was only just last week that I learned about Machairodus horribilis. So anyways, here was my request(s):
-Smilodon gracilis vs Deinonychus antirrhopus -any combination of Smilodon gracilis, Panthera atrox or Machairodus horribilis...vs Dakotaraptor steini or Achillobator giganticus
-Panthera atrox vs Utahraptor ostrommaysi
And here's a non-cat size comparison: -Allosaurus fragilis vs Daeodon shoshonensis
Coming up! Should have all of 'em in an hour or so |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Dec 9, 2019 0:28:24 GMT 5
roninwolf1981 , here's that first one. The rest will be posted right after this Smilodon gracilis (largest specimens, 85 cm shoulder height, 95 kg) vs average-size Deinonychus (41 cm skull, 111 kg). Credit to Wikimedia Commons for Smilodon and Gunnar Bivens for Deino. Scalebar is 1 meter. 
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Dec 9, 2019 0:38:21 GMT 5
Max American lion (120 cm shoulder height, 350 kg) vs Utahraptor (60 cm femur, ~2/3 of a tonne). Credit to Prehistoric Fauna and Hartman respectively, scalebar is 1 meter  |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Dec 9, 2019 0:51:49 GMT 5
Machairodus horribilis max size (125 cm shoulder height, 300 kg) vs Achillobator holotype (5 meters, 350 kg, based on Utahraptor). Scale squares are 50 cm, credit to sinnamonite and Hartman.  |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Dec 9, 2019 1:02:11 GMT 5
Holotype of Daeodon (180 cm SH, 700-800 kg) vs largest Allosaurus fragilis (1.008 meter femur, 3.2 tonnes). Scalebar is 50 cm, skeletals by blaze and Hartman.  |
|
|
|
Post by roninwolf1981 on Dec 9, 2019 2:46:44 GMT 5
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Dec 9, 2019 3:14:55 GMT 5
They're pretty fast and easy. Any more you want?
|
|
|
|
Post by roninwolf1981 on Dec 9, 2019 4:11:11 GMT 5
Lol, give me a minute; it'll take a while for me to come up with another one.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2019 4:16:29 GMT 5
komodo dragon vs leopard?
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Dec 9, 2019 4:17:28 GMT 5
I'll make that one (and the matchup!)
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Dec 9, 2019 5:31:25 GMT 5
Leopard vs Komodo dragon, average vs average. Leopard is ~69 cm shoulder height and ~53 kg, while Komodo dragon is 2.5 meters TL and ~80 kg. Scale squares are 20 cm.  |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Dec 10, 2019 4:31:26 GMT 5
American mastodon vs Mapusaurus - average vs average and max vs max. On top is average vs average, with AMNH 9950 (289 cm shoulder height, 7.8 tonnes) and MCF-PVPH-108.169 (12.47 meters along the curves, 7 tonnes). Scalebar on lower right is 1 meter. On the bottom is 595BS71 (325 cm shoulder height, 11 tonnes) vs MCF-PVPH-108.145 (13.6 meters along the curves*, 8.5 tonnes). Scalebar on bottom left is 1 meter. American mastodon skeletals and top views are by Larramendi, while Mapusaurus skeletal and top view skulls are by Franoys and the rest of the Mapusaurus top view is scaled and modified from Bates Acrocanthosaurus. Size comparisons are not to scale with one another.  *To those whom it may concern, I am aware of MCF-PVPH-108.145's nature and that it could very well be bigger or smaller than what I depicted here. This is just 1 estimation, |
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Dec 11, 2019 1:33:04 GMT 5
I can't you just edit it into the post where the attachment was from? If you from now on started reposting them, the thread could become full of needless clutter.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Dec 11, 2019 1:34:47 GMT 5
Oops.
I'll fix that.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Dec 11, 2019 3:10:42 GMT 5
Triceratops vs Mapusaurus, max vs max (UCMP 128561 vs MCF-PVPH-108.145) Triceratops is scaled to ~2.7 meter skull length and is about 14 tonnes (I beefed it up a tiny bit to account for bulk increase) while Mapusaurus is scaled to 13.6 meters along the curves and is about 8.5 tonnes*. Side view skeletals are by GetAwayTrike and Franoys respectively, Triceratops top view is by Greg Paul while Mapusaurus top view is scaled and modified from Bates Acrocanthosaurus with the skull being a composite of Franoys Giganotosaurus and Carcharodontosaurus. Bottom left scalebar is 1 meter.  *To those whom it may concern, I am aware of MCF-PVPH-108.145's nature and that it could very well be bigger or smaller than what I depicted here. This is just 1 estimation |
|
