|
Post by Infinity Blade on Mar 13, 2014 6:11:38 GMT 5
Nanuqsaurus hoglundiDescription paperAbsract
"Tyrannosaurid theropods were dominant terrestrial predators in Asia and western North America during the last of the Cretaceous. The known diversity of the group has dramatically increased in recent years with new finds, but overall understanding of tyrannosaurid ecology and evolution is based almost entirely on fossils from latitudes at or below southern Canada and central Asia. Remains of a new, relatively small tyrannosaurine were recovered from the earliest Late Maastrichtian (70-69Ma) of the Prince Creek Formation on Alaska's North Slope. Cladistic analyses show the material represents a new tyrannosaurine species closely related to the highly derived Tarbosaurus+Tyrannosaurus clade. The new taxon inhabited a seasonally extreme high-latitude continental environment on the northernmost edge of Cretaceous North America. The discovery of the new form provides new insights into tyrannosaurid adaptability, and evolution in an ancient greenhouse Arctic."^Not from the description paper. Credit goes to Karen Carr for Nanuqsaurus illustration.
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Mar 13, 2014 20:11:54 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Mar 15, 2014 17:37:33 GMT 5
5.5-6.0m fits fairly well. Based on the size comparison from the description, I get 5.8m in axial lenght, but the figure is imprecise since it isn’t a skeletal. Thus we are likely talking about an animal ~750kg in weight.
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Mar 16, 2014 21:38:27 GMT 5
I just wanted to see how our two newest tyrannosaurids, Nanuqsaurus and Lythronax, compared, and the result is rather surprising; As we see, the total skull lenghts as estimated by those restorations are consistent with Nanuqsaurus being roughly as long (~5.8m) as shown in the comparison (based on the skeletal of L. argestes), but what we can also see is that the fossil parts (most notably the dentary), are essentially the same size in both. The 12cm difference in skull lenghts (and the resulting body size disparity) seems to be a result of the more conservative reconstruction on Nanuqsaurus, which is restored as much more compact, with a proportionally shorter, deeper dentary. If you reconstruct them uniformly, our small artic tyrannosaur ought to turn out comparable to Lythronax in terms of skull lenght, and, assuming the same proportions, about a metre longer (6.8 m) and 60% heavier than usually estimated.
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Mar 16, 2014 23:06:22 GMT 5
Interesting thought, although I don't know if this is a good place for original research. It looks like the authors didn't look at Lythronax a lot (there was only one short mention in the whole paper), although both were very closely related. From what I have seen, they used a "generalized tyrannosaurid skull reconstruction", probably based on much larger animals, like Tarbosaurus or Tyrannosaurus.
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Mar 16, 2014 23:32:32 GMT 5
What you see above should not qualify as my original research, it uses nothing but the original work from the papers.
The following could probably be called that (but imo we shouldn’t try to be wikipedia in this regard): An animal more similar in size is imo a better analogue than ones several times bigger.
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Mar 16, 2014 23:33:59 GMT 5
Yeah, I kept that in mind, that's why I pointed out "much larger animals".
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Apr 26, 2014 3:29:15 GMT 5
So, is Nanuqsaurus not exactly as small as claimed?
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Apr 26, 2014 15:50:20 GMT 5
It appears it was Lythronax-sized based on the fossils, it ending up a metre shorter seems to be nothing but an artefact of the restoration.
|
|
|
Post by Admantus on Apr 27, 2014 23:47:57 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on May 13, 2019 7:03:29 GMT 5
Here is Nanuqsaurus compared to some other tyrannosaurids
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Dec 9, 2020 0:37:05 GMT 5
Some new remains seen in this video.
Also the OP needs a major overhaul. I'll try to get to it once I have the time.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Nov 12, 2021 4:15:29 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Feb 26, 2022 11:08:32 GMT 5
Paleoart by James Havens.
|
|