|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Mar 13, 2019 19:20:05 GMT 5
Which side do you generally tend to favor in the great debate, dinosaurs or proboscideans? I have a lean towards the dinosaurs due to better weaponry (theropods, ceratopsians, ankylosaurs, and some sauropods) and size (other sauropods)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2019 15:47:53 GMT 5
I tend to go for dinasaurs as you said above.
|
|
|
|
Post by DonaldCengXiongAzuma on Mar 24, 2019 20:08:00 GMT 5
I tend to favour dinasaurs over priboscideans at equal weights and slightly lighter than the proboscideans yet there are exceptions. I would support a triceretops and ankylosaurus over mammoths and elephants as they are not only better armored on the head but the armored dinasaur has a swinging tail that can cause massive damage on even a t rex. The mammoth would gore the stegosaurus to death as it can wip but doesn't gore.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Mar 24, 2019 20:23:14 GMT 5
Yeah, I agree.
I tend to favor theropods over proboscideans until the latter has about a 65 percent size advantage, and I tend to favor sauropods over proboscideans with a 50 percent or more size advantage (unless the proboscidean's tusks are curved or it's a well armed sauropod, like an Apatosaurus, then I even favor the sauropod at parity). I agree with you on the rest, especially the ceratopsians. In fact, I'd even say in Triceratops vs American mastodon that Triceratops has it in the bag.
However, I'd favor a Stegosaurus over, say a woolly mammoth. That tail would be lethal
|
|
