rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 17, 2019 23:40:54 GMT 5
With still no methodology whatsoever. I will explain what is the issue in a different thread later. they do not need to explain that , i am pretty sure they have the accurate weights , these people study these animals .
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Jun 18, 2019 0:14:26 GMT 5
How do you know that?
You do realize that you don't even need a degree in science to be a science journalist, right? Sometimes, an education in a more journalistic discipline enough. Only a fraction of scientists even have the writing skills for a career in science journalism, so you can be certain that not everyone there writes about things they have personally studied. I have no idea where these people get their data from. Maybe from reading scientific papers or interviewing scientists, maybe from books or documentaries, I have no idea.
Such websites are for making science easily comprehensible to a lay audience, not for presenting original research.
Anyway, I think you should return to your discussion with dinosauria about jaguar size.
|
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 18, 2019 0:55:18 GMT 5
How do you know that? You do realize that you don't even need a degree in science to be a science journalist, right? Sometimes, an education in a more journalistic discipline enough. Only a fraction of scientists even have the writing skills for a career in science journalism, so you can be certain that not everyone there writes about things they have personally studied. I have no idea where these people get their data from. Maybe from reading scientific papers or interviewing scientists, maybe from books or documentaries, I have no idea. Such websites are for making science easily comprehensible to a lay audience, not for presenting original research. Anyway, I think you should return to your discussion with dinosauria about jaguar size. anyways you look at it they got their information from some where and i would say they are more credible than anyone on this fourm
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jun 18, 2019 16:11:43 GMT 5
How do you know that? You do realize that you don't even need a degree in science to be a science journalist, right? Sometimes, an education in a more journalistic discipline enough. Only a fraction of scientists even have the writing skills for a career in science journalism, so you can be certain that not everyone there writes about things they have personally studied. I have no idea where these people get their data from. Maybe from reading scientific papers or interviewing scientists, maybe from books or documentaries, I have no idea. Such websites are for making science easily comprehensible to a lay audience, not for presenting original research. Anyway, I think you should return to your discussion with dinosauria about jaguar size. anyways you look at it they got their information from some where and i would say they are more credible than anyone on this fourm What makes you say that?
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jun 18, 2019 16:12:37 GMT 5
Not to be 'that guy', but do you have those studies on the supposed 130 kg jaguars?
|
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 18, 2019 16:38:21 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jun 18, 2019 16:38:57 GMT 5
As creature386 said, those are not the proper studies
|
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 18, 2019 16:39:59 GMT 5
As creature386 said, those are not the proper studies in all due respect just because he says it does not make it true
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jun 18, 2019 16:41:09 GMT 5
As creature386 said, those are not the proper studies in all due respect just because he says it does not make it true In this respect, somewhat. Have you taken a look at the post in the bad online sources thread? What you are choosing to cite fits much of the criteria for that
|
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 18, 2019 16:43:01 GMT 5
in all due respect just because he says it does not make it true In this respect, somewhat. Have you taken a look at the post in the bad online sources thread? What you are choosing to cite fits much of the criteria for that i have , but this is from a pretty credible source i doubt it is false.
|
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 18, 2019 16:44:06 GMT 5
in all due respect just because he says it does not make it true In this respect, somewhat. Have you taken a look at the post in the bad online sources thread? What you are choosing to cite fits much of the criteria for that animals.sandiegozoo.org/animals/jaguar
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jun 18, 2019 16:45:35 GMT 5
In this respect, somewhat. Have you taken a look at the post in the bad online sources thread? What you are choosing to cite fits much of the criteria for that animals.sandiegozoo.org/animals/jaguarHow does that prove 130 kg jaguars? Just because the zoo has a 130 kg jaguar does not mean that is the average size
|
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 18, 2019 16:48:26 GMT 5
How does that prove 130 kg jaguars? Just because the zoo has a 130 kg jaguar does not mean that is the average size just because they have a lioness at more than 130 kg does not mean that is its adverge size either
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jun 18, 2019 17:20:00 GMT 5
How does that prove 130 kg jaguars? Just because the zoo has a 130 kg jaguar does not mean that is the average size just because they have a lioness at more than 130 kg does not mean that is its adverge size either No it doesn't, you are correct HOWEVER, many lionesses have been weighed in the wild, and that is how we know they average 130 kg There is no such evidence for an average jaguar population of 130 kg
|
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 18, 2019 17:59:42 GMT 5
just because they have a lioness at more than 130 kg does not mean that is its adverge size either No it doesn't, you are correct HOWEVER, many lionesses have been weighed in the wild, and that is how we know they average 130 kg There is no such evidence for an average jaguar population of 130 kg show me proof www.theanimalfiles.com/mammals/carnivores/jaguar.html
|
|