|
Post by Supercommunist on Nov 13, 2022 6:21:58 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Nov 20, 2022 5:53:25 GMT 5
Recently, a study came out that found a trend of decreasing body size through time in the European cave lion ( Panthera spelaea). One specimen of P. s. fossilis was estimated at over 500 kg. In truth, there were three different methods used to estimate body size in these lions. For the Sambir lion (the specimen in question), an estimate based on calcaneus length resulted in an estimate of 912 kg. This is obviously unprecedented in size for any felid, and the authors consider this to be relatively unreliable. However, they also feel that an estimate based on the length of the first molar is an underestimate (353.2 kg). A third method, multiplying m1 length by breadth, resulted in 440 kg. The authors do not specify how >500 kg was arrived at. In fact, in context, it appears to be an arbitrary, if educated, inference. Take it for what you will. References:Marciszak, A., Ivanoff, D.V., Semenov, Y.A. et al. The Quaternary lions of Ukraine and a trend of decreasing size in Panthera spelaea. J Mammal Evol (2022). doi.org/10.1007/s10914-022-09635-3
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Nov 20, 2022 9:21:19 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Nov 24, 2022 11:03:43 GMT 5
Dakotaraptor leg length. Anybody got reliable weight estimates for the large dromaeosaurids? Most of the weight estimates I see seem to conserative.
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Nov 26, 2022 2:19:56 GMT 5
Polar bear
"In Hudson Bay, the mean scale weight of 94 males >5 years of age was 489 kg. The largest bear in that group was a 13-year-old, which weighed 654 kg (Kolenosky et al. 1992). The heaviest bear we have weighed in Alaska was 610 kg, and several animals were heavy enough that we could not raise them with our helicopter or weighing tripod. Some animals too heavy to lift have been estimated to weigh 800 kg (DeMaster and Stirling 1981). Females are smaller, with peak weights usually not exceeding 400 kg. Total lengths of males in the Beaufort Sea of Alaska ranged up to 285 cm. Such an animal may reach nearly 4 m when standing on its hind legs and is 1.7 m shoulder height when standing on all four legs. Chest girth for large males is close to 200 cm. Although smaller, females in the Beaufort sea were as long as 247 cm with chest girths up to 175 cm."
Source: The Polar Bear — Ursus maritimusBiology, Management, and Conservation by Steven C. Amstrup, Ph.D.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Dec 6, 2022 19:59:09 GMT 5
Recently, a giant pangolin ( Smutsia gigantea) in Gabon was weighed, and then had tissue samples taken and radio-collared. This pangolin was a male and weighed 42 kg, the largest on record ( link->). Such weights in pangolins aren't unprecedented. Adult male Indian pangolins ( Manis crassicaudata) measure between 137 and 177 cm from the snout to the tip of the tail, and weigh between 20.4 and 48.8 kg. The largest individual recorded so far was 48.76 kg and 176.8 cm in total body length. The Indian pangolin is sexually dimorphic, and males are much larger than females of the same age. The largest female individual sampled in this study was 7.33 kg. However, this does not reflect the true maximum weight for adult females, as this individual was a subadult. www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/1/25
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Dec 10, 2022 5:20:36 GMT 5
Wonder how much of that weight is just scales? I tried finding out how heavy a tortoise/turtles shell is compared to the rest of its body but I couldn't find anything reliable.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Dec 10, 2022 18:34:55 GMT 5
Wonder how much of that weight is just scales? I tried finding out how heavy a tortoise/turtles shell is compared to the rest of its body but I couldn't find anything reliable. Idk. For some reason I’d imagine the total number of scales weighs less relative to the pangolin than a tortoise shell is relative to the rest of the tortoise, but idk. It could be I’m underestimating how heavy all that armor is (mail didn’t seem that heavy to me either, until I held a small sample of it). As for your Dakotaraptor question, I’d honestly hold off on anything related to it for the moment. At least until/unless the remains could be recovered and studied again (the author who described it restricts access to it and is under (rightful) hot water right now with regards to a different paper).
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Dec 16, 2022 9:00:04 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Feb 5, 2023 8:34:51 GMT 5
Leopard: Cougars: Mexican Jaguar and cougars: Elk:
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Feb 5, 2023 23:00:14 GMT 5
Clouded leopard and striped hyena.
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Feb 12, 2023 4:32:54 GMT 5
Samson the largest shire horse:
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Apr 14, 2023 22:22:46 GMT 5
T. rex (average size)Certain…issues (see Carr et al. 2022) with that study notwithstanding, the recent paper by Paul and colleagues (where they purport the existence of three separate species of Tyrannosaurus, all of which, as most theropod researchers seem to agree, aren’t reliably distinguishable from T. rex and are therefore junior synonyms of that species) provides a nice compilation of measurements of various T. rex specimens. Here I’ve tried estimating the average size for T. rex (adult only) based on this dataset. [m&m] I compiled the skeletal measurements from Paul et al. 2022, and excluded exclusively dental measurements, thereby dropping two of the 36 specimens from the analysis. In the remaining 34, 26 have reported femoral measurements, while 8 only have other skeletal dimensions. I analyzed both the femur-only dataset and a combined dataset where I estimated the femur length and circumference based on maxillary, dentary, humerus or metatarsal 4 length (depending on which were available, where multiple were known, I took the mean for each resulting estimate.). I also excluded the specimens USNM 6183 and LACM 23845 (which were in the dataset, but likely represent immature individuals), resulting in an overall number of 32 specimens, probably representing a large share of all decently preserved T. rex specimens that are known. For further details of the statistical analysis, see my knitted R code here→. You can also download the dataset and the code I used to analyze it here→. Results and Discussion: This is what the resulting femur length and circumference distribution looks like: The mean femur length is 122 cm (90% CI 120-125 cm, preserved femora only, n=24) to 123 cm (90% CI 121-125 cm, full sample, n=32). That these two figures are so close to each other suggests to me that they are fairly trustworthy, and that including or excluding non-femur specimens in the sample does not have a major impact on the resulting mean size. Mean femur circumference based on only the 24 femora is 52.6 mm. When including estimated values for the 8 non-femur specimens, the value stays very similar (52.4 cm). However is should be noted that (unlike for femur length) the linear models for predicting femur circumference from other measurements tend to lack significance, so this should only be taken as indicative. So mean femur length for T. rex ends up at about 123 ± 2 cm, and mean femur circumference is about 53 ± 1 cm.We can estimate body size from that by comparison with FMNH PR 2081/Sue (being the most complete specimen). Based on this (and Hartman’s 2013 skeletal, length and mass estimate, ad 12.3 m and 8.4 tons), the average(-length) T. rex would have been about 11.5 m long and massed 6.3-6.8 t (depending on whether we scale mass from the femur circumference, which might be a bit too conservative since sue is a robust specimen, or the femur length). References:Carr, T.D., Napoli, J.G., Brusatte, S.L., Holtz, T.R., Hone, D.W., Williamson, T.E. and Zanno, L.E. 2022. Insufficient Evidence for Multiple Species of Tyrannosaurus in the Latest Cretaceous of North America: A Comment on “The Tyrant Lizard King, Queen and Emperor: Multiple Lines of Morphological and Stratigraphic Evidence Support Subtle Evolution and Probable Speciation Within the North American Genus Tyrannosaurus”. Evolutionary Biology 49 (3): 327–341. Hartman 2013 (online): North vs South Redux: Mass Estimates. www.skeletaldrawing.com/home/mass-estimates-north-vs-south-redux772013 retrieved April 14th, 2023. Paul, G.S., Persons, W.S. and Van Raalte, J. 2022. The Tyrant Lizard King, Queen and Emperor: Multiple Lines of Morphological and Stratigraphic Evidence Support Subtle Evolution and Probable Speciation Within the North American Genus Tyrannosaurus. Evolutionary Biology 49 (2): 156–179.
|
|
|
Post by spartan on Apr 24, 2023 22:54:40 GMT 5
How large did Arctodus simus get?
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Apr 25, 2023 3:08:57 GMT 5
How large did Arctodus simus get? This isn't a rock solid answer, but I think maximum body mass estimates of ~1,200 kg are about right. Even the Arctotherium angustidens paper puts A. simus at that size at max. “ Tremarctines display a wide range in body size, from gigantic (e.g., Arctotherium angustidens and Arctodus simus, up to 1,200 kg)” ( Soibelzon et al., 2011). An average body mass of ~700-800 kg still seems to be accepted in recent works. " Finally, the short‐faced bear (A. simus) is one of the rarest fossil taxa at RLB (Figueirido et al., 2017), as well as the largest. With an estimated body mass of 700−800 kg (Christiansen, 1999), this taxon exceeds the average body masses of extant ursids, with only the polar bear (~650 kg average body mass; Wilson, Mittermeier, Cavallini, 2009) of comparable stature. Only four preserved ossicular specimens have thus far been recovered from A. simus." ( Dickinson et al., 2022).
|
|