|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Mar 24, 2020 4:42:17 GMT 5
I have been convinced otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ceratodromeus on Mar 24, 2020 4:45:55 GMT 5
Considering the fact you got called out on your hypocritical behavior i am not surprised at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Mar 24, 2020 4:51:15 GMT 5
As for kekistani, I think I know how Hartman got it. I measured 32 pixels and 30 pixels at the 1st tooth for 95 and Ch1 respectively, and taht is about a 6.5% disrespancy
|
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Mar 24, 2020 4:58:37 GMT 5
Hmm...would you care to show us your measurements and whatnot?
|
|
|
|
Post by jdangerousdinosaur on Mar 24, 2020 5:08:07 GMT 5
Yeah im interested in this also no one else really knows how Hartman obtained his result for the Giga paratype, and he has not addressed the concerns from people that is why so many people are sceptical about it and use the more recent measurements that show it at 2.5 percent larger than the holotype.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Mar 24, 2020 5:26:21 GMT 5
I'm not sure how I can show you guys, but scaling via tooth depth as opposed to length (same way to get 2.2%), there are a couple places where Hartman may have got 6.5%. Each of these, I measured 3 times to be sure. Measuring Scott Hartman's Giganotosaurus (here), I got a depth of approximately 4 cm at the 13th tooth of MUCPv-95 and 3.75 cm at the 13th tooth of MUCPv-Ch1. At the 4th tooth for both, I get 3.5 and 3.3 cm. And at the 5th tooth, I get 3.2 and 3 cm. All of these have a disrespancy between them that is approximately equal to 6.5%. Maybe Hartman measured one of these and neglected to mention it. |
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Mar 24, 2020 5:38:50 GMT 5
...By literally showing us your physical measurements, how else? You say you actually measured the individual bones using pixel count this time, right? Show us the images of the bones you measured made to scale showing the discrepancy in pixel length, on whatever software you used that actually allows you to measure things.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Mar 24, 2020 5:39:32 GMT 5
There is no such software - I used a ruler.
|
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Mar 24, 2020 5:45:45 GMT 5
*rubs temples
You used a ruler? Like, an actual, physical ruler, and put it up against your computer screen?
So, how did you count the pixels, then?!
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Mar 24, 2020 5:58:15 GMT 5
Error. I meant measured with a ruler.
|
|
|
|
Post by kekistani on Mar 24, 2020 6:00:35 GMT 5
kekistani , do you have anything that suggests Scott Hartman's 6.5% for MUCPv-95 is not a defensible figure? No, the same way you have nothing to suggest T.rex could not reach 13M and 10 tonnes, except that's more likely |
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Mar 24, 2020 6:12:38 GMT 5
I know, you just told me that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ceratodromeus on Mar 24, 2020 7:02:43 GMT 5
There is no such software - I used a ruler. what |
|
|
|
Post by kekistani on Mar 24, 2020 8:42:25 GMT 5
There is no such software - I used a ruler. Ok, this is as bad as Denis right here lol |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Mar 24, 2020 16:36:12 GMT 5
Don't really have an opinion on either (at this point).
|
|
