|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jan 8, 2020 20:14:53 GMT 5
That much? Really?
Isn't that a bit...excessive?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2020 21:36:57 GMT 5
not really, that just means that for a 100 pound tosa, you'd need a leopard over 70 pounds
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jan 8, 2020 21:47:55 GMT 5
Oh. So about 65/35 in favor of the leopard at parity? Fair enough, I suppose
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2020 22:36:44 GMT 5
yea probably. Tosa can certainly win, but grappling predators should be superior to cursorial predators at parity
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jan 8, 2020 22:39:26 GMT 5
I disagree somewhat - if the jaw based predator's head is big enough, all it needs is one bite to an arm and no more grappling, while it's increasingly hard for the grappler to control that head.
I think we have a thread for this; maybe we could debate on it?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2020 22:48:52 GMT 5
sure, i mean there are many variables in consideration here. But its a general rule that has exceptions, and is only true at parity.
|
|