|
Post by dinosauria101 on Mar 13, 2020 17:45:09 GMT 5
Triceratops horridus (herd of 3) fc05.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2011/150/b/6/b64aa2e5bbf8f29377fe3a99b838e016-d3hmt69.jpgOrder: Ceratopsia Family: Chasmosauridae Length: 8-9 meters Mass: 8.6-14 tonnes Diet: Plants, possibly an omnivore. Age and Location: Late Cretaceous, 65 million years ago, Canada and United States Weapons: Horns, beak One of the most famous dinosaurs and often featured in popular culture. Had a solid frill for protection and is often likened to a rhinoceros because of its horns Mapusaurus roseae (pack of 3) www.newdinosaurs.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/344_mapusaurus_jk.jpgOrder: Theropoda Family: Carcharodontosauridae Length ~11.3 to ~13.6 meters Mass: ~5.5 to ~8.5 tonnes Diet: Other dinosaurs Age and Location: 95 million years ago, Mid Cretaceous period, Argentina Weapons: Slicing jaws, manual claws, pedal claws One of the largest carcharodontosaurids. Found in a large bonebed with many different sized individuals and thought to hunt in packs.
|
|
|
Post by 6f5e4d on Mar 15, 2020 0:53:52 GMT 5
The Triceratops are heavier and their horns allow them to stab hard into the Mapusaurus, that's why they'll win.
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Mar 15, 2020 2:58:48 GMT 5
I definitely favor the Trikes as well here. Larger, more durable, good horns to gore with, and carnosaurs are poorly adapted to hunt ceratopsians, as well as MUCH more robust.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Mar 15, 2020 3:31:33 GMT 5
This is basically the Triceratops vs Mapusaurus thread-> except three of these are going on at the same time in the same place. Don't really think there's much merit for it.
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Mar 15, 2020 4:35:22 GMT 5
Suppose we could move the posts over there, then.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Mar 15, 2020 4:42:59 GMT 5
No need to. I'm just going to close this thread. If anyone wants to discuss Triceratops vs Mapusaurus further, they can go into the 1v1 thread linked to above.
|
|