|
Post by dinosauria101 on Mar 16, 2020 20:43:53 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by 6f5e4d on Mar 16, 2020 21:08:13 GMT 5
Liopleurodon is much bigger than Mastodonsaurus, and has a much stronger bite compared to it, so it seems to have the advantage here.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Mar 16, 2020 21:26:54 GMT 5
If Mastodonsaurus' skin was anything like that of the vast majority of modern lissamphibians, just being in saltwater could eventually kill it. From what I understand there is one modern saltwater amphibian (the crab-eating frog) and the reason it can survive in such an environment is because its kidneys produce a lot of urea that allow it to maintain osmotic equilibrium in a saltwater environment. Otherwise, it would dehydrate.
But I'm not sure how much this was the case for ancient lissamphibians. Then again, Mastodonsaurus somehow doesn't particularly strike me as a saltwater animal.
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Mar 16, 2020 21:56:32 GMT 5
Ouch. That's rough.
Would fresh water kill Liopleurodon? Maybe a fight in a deep lake would be fairer
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Mar 16, 2020 22:04:13 GMT 5
No. It's just that any ventures into freshwater Liopleurodon may have made would probably have been rare.
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Mar 16, 2020 22:56:16 GMT 5
I suppose that'd be a more even matchup than saltwater, than.
|
|
|
Post by 6f5e4d on Mar 19, 2020 6:35:10 GMT 5
Some temnospondyls may have evidence of scales and the possibility of being able to go into saltwater because of that, however, the Liopleurodon would most likely still have an advantage over Mastodonsaurus with its stronger bite.
|
|