|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Aug 10, 2019 2:04:57 GMT 5
Isn't a stats equal fight kind of pointless? Can you make an argument for why either one's other abilities will give them the edge, rock? the reason many people say goku vs naruto is a mismatch is because goku is universal , while naruto is a low tier planet buster , but if we equaled out those factors then naruto can stand a chance if we put naruto up to universal tier What I'm saying is that if you gave them equal stats, i.e. equal strength, speed, durability, and busting power, they would not be able to defeat the other more often than not based off of those attributes alone; they'd be even in power. Now, I've never watched Naruto, so I don't know what other skills, abilities, and equipment that Naruto may have that may prove (dis)advantageous against Goku. But if neither have any such advantage outside the aforementioned stats, the battle is just a foregone conclusion: it would just be an even fight. |
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Aug 10, 2019 2:34:39 GMT 5
These are a bit difficult to evaluate (so I'll wait for Infinity Blade's input). Equalizing stats tends to be more easy for fictional characters than for animals since in the former, the laws of physics are a lot priority anyway. For the other two, it really depends on the versions used. i was thinking of classic sonic vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Sonic_the_Hedgehog_(Classic)vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Ryu_(Street_Fighter)cancel that one i dont think megaman would do too well against any version of mario as they are all either high planet or galaxy level Thinking about it, Megaman vs Mario would have been the best of the matches you suggested. Both have a strong connection due to being famous Nintendo mascots. Plus, stats equalization would be easy due to the extremely low level of realism of most Mario and Megaman games (not to mention that some versions of Mario and Megaman are definitely equal in stats, such as those in Super Smash Brothers). I wonder if we should discuss assumptions beforehand or just make the thread and everyone can post their take/assumptions there. On the other hand, considering how I think I have opinions on this matchup that might contradict the others', I'd say approve. It's gonna spark debate and that's what these threads are for, |
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Aug 10, 2019 6:46:17 GMT 5
So we're making Mario vs Megaman? I'll approve.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Aug 10, 2019 19:42:41 GMT 5
Would I be able to make Ceratosaurus vs Gorgosaurus at parity?
The reason I'm asking is because there are no advanced, bone crushing tyrannosaurs that overlap enough with Ceratosaurus enough to make a good AvA fight, and both are fairly popular dinosaurs so this would likely get some responses, but the scaling disparity isn't so large it wouldn't have a significant impact on either combatant concerning any of the troublesome square cube effects we discussed earlier in the thread
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Aug 12, 2019 19:13:36 GMT 5
Re-requesting Ceratosaurus vs Gorgosaurus at parity
Or, if that's not doable for any reason, I have a couple of other ideas, one of which is a gauntlet
|
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Aug 12, 2019 19:38:49 GMT 5
I...guess it could work. Although if you could use an actual tyrannosaurid that was in Ceratosaurus' weight range (if any such exists) then that may be better. Then again, no adult albertosaurine exists at that size, so maybe one can make an argument off of the differences between tyrannosaurines and albertosaurines.
I'll let creature386 make his judgement as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Aug 12, 2019 20:17:11 GMT 5
Approved.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Aug 13, 2019 18:01:21 GMT 5
Would I be able to do Triceratops Runs The Gauntlet: Part 3?
These are the weights and opponents:
-Triceratops, 9 tons
-Woolly mammoth, 6 tons (Round 1)
-American mastodon, 7.8 tons (Round 2)
-Columbian mammoth, 9 tons (Round 3)
-Mapusaurus, 7 tons (Round 4)
-Therizinosaurus, 5 tons (Round 5)
-Elasmotherium, 5 tons (Round 6)
-Euoplocephalus, 2.5 tons (Round 7)
-Purussaurus, 8 tons, land (Round 8)
-Dacentrurus, 8 tons (Round 9)
-Paraceratherium, 11 tons (Round 10)
-Diplodocus, 12 tons (Round 11)
-Mamenchisaurus anyuensis, 25 tons (Round 12)
|
|
|
|
Post by DonaldCengXiongAzuma on Aug 13, 2019 18:07:45 GMT 5
Terminator (20) vs Xenomorph Queen.
|
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Aug 13, 2019 21:36:50 GMT 5
dinosauria101Three gauntlets sounds a bit much, especially since gauntlets by their nature allow an animal to face-off against all sorts of opponents. Sure, your version adds a bunch of large animals, but the fact that we already have a thread for the most interesting of these matchups (Mamenchisaurus vs Triceratops) kinda weakens the novelty. DonaldCengXiongAzumaDoes the "20" refer to a model or a number?
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Aug 13, 2019 22:39:06 GMT 5
|
|
|
|
Post by DonaldCengXiongAzuma on Aug 14, 2019 2:47:51 GMT 5
/\Nice one. Btw guys, I was actually thinking about twenty t-800 models.
|
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Aug 14, 2019 3:06:04 GMT 5
Eh, go ahead (I still consider it kinda imbalanced, but not to the extent that I'd say there's nothing to discuss).
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Aug 14, 2019 16:27:12 GMT 5
Anyone have any suitable 'replacement' ideas for 4 Daspletosaurus and Apatosaurus in a gauntlet?
I was going to do 'Sauroposeidon runs the gauntlet', but we have both of those matchups already, so new opponents are likely better
|
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Aug 14, 2019 17:54:34 GMT 5
Your gauntlet doesn't have to be 100% original, I only said this for the Triceratops gauntlet because we already had two.
Since we have no Sauroposeidon gauntlet yet, you can include these two.
|
|
