|
Post by Grey on Nov 10, 2014 10:10:03 GMT 5
I m very much skeptical about the hybrid too but again that's not all about it and we dont have much info. Other than tjis, T. rex will be back, raptors too, Mosasaurus will appear, there are rumored actions with herbivores (Ankylosaurus). That's not fair to focuse only on the reported and mysterious hybrid. The trailer is for very soon, let's wait.
|
|
|
Post by allosaurusatrox on Nov 10, 2014 10:19:57 GMT 5
But are these the actual animals, or only more mixmashes?
|
|
|
Post by allosaurusatrox on Nov 10, 2014 10:23:29 GMT 5
But are these the actual animals, or only more mixmashes? Are they so worried about a dinofilm (I don't blame them, WWDTM was a disaster) that they have to make their star a Hollywood monster? Thinking about it, there hasn't been a good dinofilm since 2001. And I don't see one in the foreseeable future. Unless this new director guy will dump the mixmash stuff and go back to what made Jurassic park the icon it is, we may never again get a good dinofilm. But can we put this argument to bed before the fists start flying? What's your favorite of the original trilogy?
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Nov 10, 2014 13:17:59 GMT 5
But are these the actual animals, or only more mixmashes? Of course not, there's only one reported mixed animal all the others are the actual dinosaurs, check the list I ve posted earlier. The purpose of the mixed animal is to question about the genetics ethic and limits. But that's not all about that creature, there will be the good old dinos plus some new ones (Mosasaurus, Dimorphodon). And there 90 % chances that the movie will be better than the 2001 JP3. Much longer preoaration, much better worked, more ambitious, more budget (equivalent to the last Godzilla movie). The trailer will appear in few weeks.
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Nov 10, 2014 16:55:35 GMT 5
Can someone bring me up to date? What's that hybrid animal you were discussing?
EDIT: Btw neither Mosasaurus nor Dimorphodon are dinos. And a big budget doesn’t make a good film, and isn’t comparable between different times anyway. JP3’s budget was far larger than the first movie’s…
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Nov 10, 2014 20:01:29 GMT 5
And there 90 % chances that the movie will be better than the 2001 JP3. I hope quality will this time also have a correlation with attention, Jurassic Park lost a lot of hype in this century.
|
|
|
Post by allosaurusatrox on Nov 10, 2014 23:37:44 GMT 5
Can someone bring me up to date? What's that hybrid animal you were discussing? EDIT: Btw neither Mosasaurus nor Dimorphodon are dinos. And a big budget doesn’t make a good film, and isn’t comparable between different times anyway. JP3’s budget was far larger than the first movie’s… The hybrid is a tyrannoconda cuttle. A bipedal creature with tentacles lining its mouth to drag in prey, and a long tail to strangle it, it also can change color. From what I've read.
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Nov 11, 2014 0:32:24 GMT 5
Can someone bring me up to date? What's that hybrid animal you were discussing? EDIT: Btw neither Mosasaurus nor Dimorphodon are dinos. And a big budget doesn’t make a good film, and isn’t comparable between different times anyway. JP3’s budget was far larger than the first movie’s… The hybrid is a tyrannoconda cuttle. A bipedal creature with tentacles lining its mouth to drag in prey, and a long tail to strangle it, it also can change color. From what I've read. Absolutely not, Trevorrow specifically precised that there wont be such things as tentacles and things like that. The only right point is the chameleon-like feature, which is based on the Carnotaurus of The Lost World Novel.
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Nov 11, 2014 0:49:56 GMT 5
And where have you read that?
|
|
|
Post by allosaurusatrox on Nov 11, 2014 1:00:40 GMT 5
On a JP forum, it also showed a spinosaur like head that could split into three jaws. One lower, two uppers.
Even if its false about the tentacles and whatnot, this tyrannoconda cuttle still isn't the best design idea. Just stick with real animals. Its what made JP great to begin with, it was something more than a monster flick.
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Nov 11, 2014 1:12:32 GMT 5
One lower, two uppers? Not the other way around?
That would be a truly hilarious idea, I don’t know any vertebrate that does that. Rather sounds like Pacific Rim (good movie btw, but JP isn’t about Aliens)?
Lateral flexibility between mandibular rami on the other hand is nothing unusual (well-known from snakes).
|
|
|
Post by allosaurusatrox on Nov 11, 2014 1:22:59 GMT 5
One lower, two uppers? Not the other way around? That would be a truly hilarious idea, I don’t know any vertebrate that does that. Rather sounds like Pacific Rim (good movie btw, but JP isn’t about Aliens)? Lateral flexibility between mandibular rami on the other hand is nothing unusual (well-known from snakes). Nope. Think skag from borderlands( my brother used to play it.) PC was meh. Apearently by that time humans practice male parthenogenisis, as their is only one or two females in the movie. And the "science" guy said dinosaurs had two brains(!?!). But no, JP isn't about aliens or monsters. P.s. Baleen whales can partially dislocate their lower jaws too, just not to the extent of snakes.
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Nov 11, 2014 1:56:45 GMT 5
Guys, that's TOTAL BULLSHIT. Why do you believe the hogwash written on any internet forum. There's no such things annunced for Jurassic World, Trevorrow made it clear.
The creature will have a chameleon-like ability, apparently jaws acting in a snake-like motion and will be of large size.
But NO splitting in parts jaws, no tentacles, not that kind of shit. Check your sources right.
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Nov 11, 2014 2:06:04 GMT 5
Dislocating jaws like a snake=splitting the jaws in half. But the lower jaws, not the upper jaws. The lower jaw is realistic among tetrapods, possibly even for a theropod. allosaurusatrox Never heard of that game. Yup, mysticetes can do it too. They also don't have teeth though, or normal TMJs…
|
|
|
Post by allosaurusatrox on Nov 11, 2014 2:12:53 GMT 5
I'm sorry
|
|