|
Post by Grey on Nov 16, 2014 1:38:26 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Nov 23, 2014 23:34:41 GMT 5
The main teaser is for the 27.
|
|
|
Post by mechafire on Nov 24, 2014 11:21:46 GMT 5
A new jurassic park movie? Please no
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Nov 24, 2014 15:52:48 GMT 5
Wait before talking, I ve seen leaked parts of the trailer. It seems exceptionnal.
The Mosasaurus is colossal.
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Nov 24, 2014 15:55:14 GMT 5
I don’t think that has and effect on what he wrote. He was pretty clear about simply not wanting another Jurassic Park movie…
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Nov 24, 2014 16:52:13 GMT 5
That has perfectly to do something, JW is a legitimate and long time desired sequel among fans. People could at least see even one shot of the movie before arguing.
I m surprised too that there are still paleo-enthusiasts not aware of this sequel, it was annunced almost two years ago.
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Nov 24, 2014 17:46:46 GMT 5
Are you saying everyone has to look forward to this sequel?
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Nov 24, 2014 17:48:53 GMT 5
I m saying people can't judge without see it.
|
|
gigadino96
Junior Member
Vi ravviso, o luoghi ameni
Posts: 226
|
Post by gigadino96 on Nov 24, 2014 18:12:22 GMT 5
What a pity the Gallimimus in that video are scaly. I was hoping for feathered dinosaurs.
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Nov 24, 2014 18:14:12 GMT 5
That is known since a long that no feathers will be seen in the movie. Maybe that will be explained in the movie.
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Nov 24, 2014 18:20:14 GMT 5
I m saying people can't judge without see it. Well, that was the point, he wasn’t judging it, he just doesn’t want another JP movie. For me, that’s rather easily understandable. After all, as you wrote yourself, it is already known that there will be "no feathers seen". Basically that’s the same scientific level as the first one, but 22 years later. gigadino96: Also, still those pronated hands!
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Nov 24, 2014 18:49:48 GMT 5
At least one can check it before arguing. After the half-failure of JP3 there were good reasons for that a new movie was made. Sure, the lack of feathers is disturbing but maybe it will be justified in the movie, and anyway the whole movie does not stand on the feathers alone, one can focus on others new additions. Also, it's a movie not a truly scientific depiction. It's planned to be a new trilogy, maybe we'll get feathered animals later. I d rather take JW as a tribute to the first JP in that they absolutely wanted to re-use the scaly creatures. If people are not interested in another JP movie well they dont need to read this thread.
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Nov 24, 2014 18:57:39 GMT 5
Especially after JP 3 it should be quite understandable that people aren’t keen on yet another part.
What did set JP apart from a dumb monster movie if not its somewhat scientific portrayal of real animals? Throughout the last two films, nothing has been done to live up to that legacy by adaptiong to scientific findings, and it looks like this movie ain’t going to change that (even the short teaser already showed two of the main flaws).
|
|
gigadino96
Junior Member
Vi ravviso, o luoghi ameni
Posts: 226
|
Post by gigadino96 on Nov 24, 2014 19:45:09 GMT 5
Adding some feathers (and possibly more correct dinosaurs models) would haven't been a bad idea. Another film, Dinosaur Island, did it, and T.rex in this trailer looks awesome: www.youtube.com/watch?v=U18sOypRW8s(But this film appears to suck in everything else)
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Nov 24, 2014 20:44:46 GMT 5
Especially after JP 3 it should be quite understandable that people aren’t keen on yet another part. What did set JP apart from a dumb monster movie if not its somewhat scientific portrayal of real animals? Throughout the last two films, nothing has been done to live up to that legacy by adaptiong to scientific findings, and it looks like this movie ain’t going to change that (even the short teaser already showed two of the main flaws). JP3 had many issues during the production, it's no wonder that the result wasnt that good (it is even pretty good keeping in mind the conditions). JW production has been much better prepared. Regarding the scientific accuracy, at first no, JP3 at least tried to present feathers and vocalization at the time. Each film in tje series tried to present news points somewhat scientifically hinted. And that can be the case fir that one too. And again it's been a long the missing feathers were annunced, that s a bit sad but we still can focus on the others elements. What counts is to make a good movie.
|
|