|
Post by theropod on Dec 13, 2014 17:39:59 GMT 5
Lol, lifelike? Really? Isn’t that punishable as fraud or something like that?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2015 8:12:23 GMT 5
This skeleton is supposed to be an "Albertosaurus". Not to mention that Riebeeckosaurus-headed "Tyrannosaurus"...as in really, just wow.
|
|
Dakotaraptor
Junior Member
Used to be Metriacanthosaurus
Posts: 193
|
Post by Dakotaraptor on Oct 18, 2015 0:34:28 GMT 5
Have you guys ever seen an pregnant dinosaur?
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Oct 18, 2015 1:36:01 GMT 5
^Now I have! But that doesn’t seem to be its only problem.
|
|
Cross
Junior Member
The biggest geek this side of the galaxy. Avatar is Dakotaraptor steini from Saurian.
Posts: 266
|
Post by Cross on Oct 27, 2015 9:14:07 GMT 5
LegendaryDragon90's "Giganotosaurus". How many times have you seen someone attempt to make a large theropod scarier by adding excessive amounts of scutes, horns, crests, making it more robust, and enlarging the teeth? I see this way too often. Spinosaurus and Giganotosaurus are the most frequent victims of this.
|
|
Cross
Junior Member
The biggest geek this side of the galaxy. Avatar is Dakotaraptor steini from Saurian.
Posts: 266
|
Post by Cross on Oct 27, 2015 9:23:28 GMT 5
To further prove my point about trying to make large theropods looks scarier by adding excessive amounts of armor, spikes, and enlarging the skull and teeth : "Spinosaurus" "Tyrannosaurus" "Tarbosaurus" "Carcharodonotosaurus"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2015 10:16:30 GMT 5
TBH, the carcharodontosaur's spikiness is kinda plausible, just make them quills and you're set.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Oct 27, 2015 16:12:51 GMT 5
The teeth don't really look implausiblely large to me either.
|
|