|
|
Post by 0ldgrizz on Dec 31, 2014 16:03:56 GMT 5
The ultimate fighter vs the unbeatable giant - or the unstoppable force meets the immovable object. Who would win in a "real" wrestling match?
|
|
|
|
Post by mechafire on Feb 26, 2015 13:52:22 GMT 5
Who would win would just depend on the booker.
The match itself would suck. Though, probably better than hogan v Andre because of how athletic and energetic Brock would be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vodmeister on Feb 27, 2015 9:24:03 GMT 5
Lesnar would beat Andre in a real fight, IMO. Andre might be larger, but Lesnar is no dwarf himself (6'3 270 lbs), immensely strong, and has real-world fighting credentials (he's an actual UFC Heavyweight Champion).
|
|
|
|
Post by mechafire on Feb 27, 2015 9:28:58 GMT 5
Of course Brock would beat andre in a real fight.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vodmeister on Feb 28, 2015 20:37:12 GMT 5
I wouldn't be sure about that. Andre was massive and size matters, but yes in general Lesnar has too many advantages.
|
|
|
|
Post by mechafire on Mar 1, 2015 1:26:30 GMT 5
Andre was too big and prone to injury. There is a reason why he barely takes bumps. And he apparently didn't work out much. compare him to someone like big show or Henry and you can tell those two move a lot better than him. No disrespect to the giant, but Brock would destroy him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vodmeister on Mar 1, 2015 5:40:12 GMT 5
If John Cena and Big Show had a match on Raw this coming Monday, and replicated the exact same match as Andre vs Hogan at WrestleMania 3, move for move, it would be considered rubbish.
It was the enormous hype which turned Andre vs Hogan into such a legendary spectacle, not the match itself (IMO).
|
|
