Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2018 3:55:25 GMT 5
It depends on the individuals in question.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Feb 12, 2019 1:26:07 GMT 5
The Bengal tiger and the African lion are exactly on par with one another, and seeing as the grizzly is superior to the lion, that's the case here as well.
|
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 1, 2019 18:30:55 GMT 5
the bear wins it is heavier , stronger , has a better bite force and has better weapons , a closer match would be a grizzly bear vs a siberian tiger.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jun 1, 2019 19:10:42 GMT 5
^I agree, but Siberians are smaller than Bengals actually
|
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 1, 2019 20:23:17 GMT 5
^I agree, but Siberians are smaller than Bengals actually no they are not ,  |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jun 1, 2019 20:24:18 GMT 5
^I agree, but Siberians are smaller than Bengals actually no they are not , Which one is which? |
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 1, 2019 21:22:42 GMT 5
no they are not , Which one is which? the smaller one is the bengal tiger the larger one is the siberian tiger , if you mean which is more aggresive then yes bengal tigers on adverge are more aggresive than siberian tigers. |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jun 2, 2019 9:46:44 GMT 5
the smaller one is the bengal tiger the larger one is the siberian tiger , if you mean which is more aggresive then yes bengal tigers on adverge are more aggresive than siberian tigers. Err....not quite there, my friend You do know hunting of Siberians has made Bengals the larger of the 2 in modern times? |
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 2, 2019 16:35:45 GMT 5
the smaller one is the bengal tiger the larger one is the siberian tiger , if you mean which is more aggresive then yes bengal tigers on adverge are more aggresive than siberian tigers. Err....not quite there, my friend You do know hunting of Siberians has made Bengals the larger of the 2 in modern times?  as you can see siberian tigers are a little bit bigger |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jun 2, 2019 16:37:43 GMT 5
Err....not quite there, my friend You do know hunting of Siberians has made Bengals the larger of the 2 in modern times? as you can see siberian tigers are a little bit bigger Source? Nowadays, it's common knowledge Bengals are larger |
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 2, 2019 17:51:07 GMT 5
as you can see siberian tigers are a little bit bigger Source? Nowadays, it's common knowledge Bengals are larger thats a little bit strange , but siberian tigers are larger and stronger than bengal tigers |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jun 2, 2019 18:19:23 GMT 5
Source? Nowadays, it's common knowledge Bengals are larger thats a little bit strange , but siberian tigers are larger and stronger than bengal tigers They WERE larger. Due to hunting and habitat loss, Siberians average about 30 kg smaller than Bengals |
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 2, 2019 18:27:35 GMT 5
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jun 2, 2019 18:31:37 GMT 5
No need to worry rock. I will post on every single one of your threads I can contribute to (however, I may wait until later today or tomorrow for the purpose of future activity maintenace) Anyhow, less habitat means less living space and less resources, and as such the tigers must get smaller in order to survive |
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 2, 2019 18:35:49 GMT 5
No need to worry rock. I will post on every single one of your threads I can contribute to (however, I may wait until later today or tomorrow for the purpose of future activity maintenace) Anyhow, less habitat means less living space and less resources, and as such the tigers must get smaller in order to survive i guess that makes sense , however if both are well feed and resorces are not a issue then the siberian tiger will tend to grow larger. |
|
