rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 23, 2019 23:31:51 GMT 5
It was my general impression that no one here is in any doubt regarding humans being omnivores. I assume we are just here to poke some fun at a radical vegan presenting his "alternative" facts (which are wrong, just to be perfectly clear). Humans are of course omnivores. As I already wrote, there is fairly unambiguous evidence of that. But we’ve already discussed this relatively simple matter far more than it deserves. That being said, I did learn something interesting from this thread, namely the mechanism by which ruminants get their B12 and that it could theoretically work for humans,given the aforementioned adaptations creature and myself outlined. Of course humans do not have those adaptations, which flies totally in the face of any notion that we are herbivores. good , thanks for clearing that up |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jun 23, 2019 23:38:25 GMT 5
Poking fun at radical vegans?
In that case (serious question actually), how do all of you think, say Peta or another radical group,would react to hearing that people are actually omnivores?
|
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 23, 2019 23:47:34 GMT 5
Poking fun at radical vegans? In that case (serious question actually), how do all of you think, say Peta or another radical group,would react to hearing that people are actually omnivores? peta is full of crap , besides their lies about how humans are herbivores , peta kills nearly all the animals they take in , this picture shows just how bad they really are.  there is nothing wrong with being vegan or vegetarian however that being said , there is something wrong with vegans and vegetarians forcing their will on others and lying saying humans are not natrual meat eaters and making up lies and not only that but favoring the thoughts of doctors and dietations over anthropologists and biologists . |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jun 23, 2019 23:52:03 GMT 5
Poking fun at radical vegans? In that case (serious question actually), how do all of you think, say Peta or another radical group,would react to hearing that people are actually omnivores? peta is full of crap , besides their lies about how humans are herbivores , peta kills nearly all the animals they take in , this picture shows just how bad they really are. there is nothing wrong with being vegan or vegetarian however that being said , there is something wrong with vegans and vegetarians forcing their will on others and lying saying humans are not natrual meat eaters and making up lies and not only that but favoring the thoughts of doctors and dietations over anthropologists and biologists .  They're so hypocritical it's actually kind of funny! |
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 23, 2019 23:59:16 GMT 5
peta is full of crap , besides their lies about how humans are herbivores , peta kills nearly all the animals they take in , this picture shows just how bad they really are. there is nothing wrong with being vegan or vegetarian however that being said , there is something wrong with vegans and vegetarians forcing their will on others and lying saying humans are not natrual meat eaters and making up lies and not only that but favoring the thoughts of doctors and dietations over anthropologists and biologists . They're so hypocritical it's actually kind of funny! it is funny how they are the ones pointing at everyone for eating meat , riding horses and keeping pets yet they kill more animals than even farms do , also they recently stole a puppy from a girl and killed it www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/17/peta-sorry-for-taking-girls-dog-putting-it-downand yet they try to defend this action www.peta.org/blog/euthanize/ |
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Jun 24, 2019 0:11:34 GMT 5
rockEven if you are against what PETA does (so am I, I prefer sterilization and letting them die a natural death as a solution to pet overpopulation), to claim they are worse than Michael Vick is ridiculous. The Michael Vick's of this world (AKA animal abusers) are the reasons PETA is doing this. Yes, maybe the end does not justify the means, but that's not on the same level as a guy who kills animals for fun. I'm also interested why it is wrong to kill animals to end their suffering is wrong while killing them for food is just fine.
|
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 24, 2019 0:14:59 GMT 5
rock Even if you are against what PETA does (so am I, I prefer sterilization and letting them die a natural death as a solution to pet overpopulation), to claim they are worse than Michael Vick is ridiculous. The Michael Vick's of this world (AKA animal abusers) are the reasons PETA is doing this. Yes, maybe the end does not justify the means, but that's not on the same level as a guy who kills animals for fun. peta is worse than michel vick , they steal a little girls puppy and killed it , they kill thousands of animals and gave out your mommy kills animal books i mind you to little kids . www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/17/peta-sorry-for-taking-girls-dog-putting-it-down also peta is noticed as a hate group www.greenisthenewred.com/blog/peta-terrorists-usda-form/2374/ |
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jun 24, 2019 0:18:19 GMT 5
I'm also interested why it is wrong to kill animals to end their suffering is wrong while killing them for food is just fine. (If you were referring to PETA's policies), it's the other way around. They just don't seem to get that livng things need to die for others to live |
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Jun 24, 2019 0:24:41 GMT 5
rockAre there more cases like the one with the chihuahua? If not, it is possible that they indeed made a mistake. @dinosauria Can't you justify their euthanasia that way, too? If what they're saying is true (that their shelters are full, that only few people adopt the animals and that they are taking the animals other shelters don't want to), they could also say that they must euthanize some of the animals to address the pet overpopulation problem.
|
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 24, 2019 0:27:12 GMT 5
I'm also interested why it is wrong to kill animals to end their suffering is wrong while killing them for food is just fine. (If you were referring to PETA's policies), it's the other way around. They just don't seem to get that livng things need to die for others to live they should be against herbivore animals too , cows eat meat  most of the animals they stand up for include meat in their diets as well like chickiens and pigs , both chickiens and pigs are omnivores chickien eats centipede pig eats snake they just dont get the circle of life lol. |
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 24, 2019 0:29:13 GMT 5
rock Are there more cases like the one with the chihuahua? If not, it is possible that they indeed made a mistake. @dinosauria Can't you justify their euthanasia that way, too? If what they're saying is true (that their shelters are full, that only few people adopt the animals and that they are taking the animals other shelters don't want to), they could also say that they must euthanize some of the animals to address the pet overpopulation problem. |
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Jun 24, 2019 0:30:24 GMT 5
This is the same case, unless they euthanized two chihuahuas from two 9-year old girls called Maya.
|
|
|
|
Post by dinosauria101 on Jun 24, 2019 0:32:47 GMT 5
rock Are there more cases like the one with the chihuahua? If not, it is possible that they indeed made a mistake. @dinosauria Can't you justify their euthanasia that way, too? If what they're saying is true (that their shelters are full, that only few people adopt the animals and that they are taking the animals other shelters don't want to), they could also say that they must euthanize some of the animals to address the pet overpopulation problem. Ummm....I don't think their euthanasia can be justified in the least; see petakillsanimals.com to know more I suppose they could say that, but I have my doubts as to whether it could fool anyone who knows the truth |
|
rock
Senior Member Rank 1
Posts: 1,586
|
Post by rock on Jun 24, 2019 0:33:36 GMT 5
This is the same case, unless they euthanized two chihuahuas from two 9-year old girls called Maya. even if they did it once , it is one too many , especailly if they are vegans , so i guess they favor pigs , chickiens and cows over dogs and cats? seams biased to me |
|
|
|
Post by creature386 on Jun 24, 2019 0:43:05 GMT 5
Ok, Ok, if their main reason for doing this is indeed believing that a pet should rather be dead than having an owner, their practices are indeed euthanasia. I also looked up the case with the chihuahua and indeed, if they snuck onto someone's property, it was definitely theft and no mistake.
So yeah, they're quite horrible.
That being said, I wouldn't call them complete hypocrites. It does make some sense if you are willing to buy that pet ownership is basically slavery (which is nonsense, of course).
|
|
