|
Post by creature386 on Apr 2, 2014 20:12:13 GMT 5
We had this discussion on carnivora. Some people demanded more evidence for such claims.
|
|
Apex
Junior Member
Posts: 207
|
Post by Apex on Apr 3, 2014 2:10:57 GMT 5
Oh yeah..... Sorry about that 221Extra.... I was slightly immature and biased
|
|
|
Post by Vodmeister on Apr 3, 2014 4:20:30 GMT 5
Yai was 6.0 meters long and weighed 1,114 kg at the age of 28. www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdjOQHnPlHQThat video was taken back in June 2000, nowadays Yai is 41-42 yrs old. Check out the growth rate of Deinosuchus; Hell, I wonder how big Yai is now!
|
|
|
Post by Vodmeister on Apr 5, 2014 10:41:51 GMT 5
|
|
Dakotaraptor
Junior Member
Used to be Metriacanthosaurus
Posts: 193
|
Post by Dakotaraptor on Apr 6, 2014 2:27:32 GMT 5
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Apr 20, 2014 23:16:27 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Apr 21, 2014 2:51:36 GMT 5
That’s consistent with what we discussed with Godzillasaurus some time ago.
|
|
|
Post by elosha11 on Apr 21, 2014 3:30:21 GMT 5
Thanks Blaze. Not at all surprised Purussaurus could perform the death roll, it has such a wide and massive head. I think pound for pound, it was the probably the most formidable ancient crocodilian, if not necessarily the largest.
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Jul 24, 2014 18:39:00 GMT 5
Looking at it, Purussaurus has quite clearly the most voluminous, massive skull around but in Foffa et al. while comparing P. kevanis skull with other reptiles, they report Deinosuchus skull at around 1.85 m ?
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Jul 24, 2014 21:09:54 GMT 5
They probably didn't read anything newer than Colder and Bird (1954) original description of Phobosuchus (=Deinosuchus) riograndensis, it's often misquoted as them having reconstructed an skull "6 feet long" when what they estimated to be that length was the lower jaw, the dorsocranial length they estimate for the skull itself is actually 1500mm but it doesn't really matter, their reconstruction is inaccurate and their specimen wasn't even that big.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Jul 25, 2014 20:24:27 GMT 5
|
|
blaze
Paleo-artist
Posts: 766
|
Post by blaze on Jul 25, 2014 21:55:11 GMT 5
Purussaurus mirandai, described in 2006 from the Late Miocene Urumaco Formation, age and locality match, it has to be it, the size is wrong but you know how these things are.
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Jul 25, 2014 22:26:03 GMT 5
Just based on the volume of the skull, even if it's highly speculative and subject to fluctuation, can we suggest than that Purussaurus is the biggest (heaviest) crocodilian to date ?
|
|
|
Post by theropod on Jul 25, 2014 22:36:38 GMT 5
Skull volume is not necessarily indicative of body size.
|
|
|
Post by Grey on Jul 25, 2014 23:11:11 GMT 5
I fairly know but unless there is a vast discrepancy in the volumentric ratio skull/body between Deinosuchus and Purussaurus, I find the skull of Purussaurus vastly bigger on the chart. I've also precised on a highly speculative thought.
|
|