|
Post by Supercommunist on Jul 8, 2022 4:18:46 GMT 5
Phyrthic victory.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Aug 11, 2022 3:25:26 GMT 5
Common duiker vs cheetah, both adult females. The duiker was killed by the cheetah, but not before delivering a kick with its hoof that cut the cheetah's abdomen and femoral artery. The cheetah ended up bleeding to death overnight, despite receiving veterinary care. journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.3957/056.048.024001Supercommunist
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Aug 11, 2022 5:30:44 GMT 5
This is quite possibly the only footage I've seen of an ostrich actually acting aggressively towards predators, and spotted hyenas, no less. While there is no kill here, the ostrich chases a hyena and kicks at it, prompting the hyenas to retreat.
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Sept 1, 2022 5:12:47 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Sept 4, 2022 2:26:02 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Mar 5, 2023 9:17:02 GMT 5
Young giraffe kicks a lion.
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Mar 14, 2023 5:09:54 GMT 5
This probably isn't the right thread for this but I felt like talking about the more scientific orientated paleo community habit of treating carnivores like skittish opportunists. I get that they are sick of seeing carnivores treating herbivoreslike walking sacks of meat in hollywood, but c'mon do people really think an adult edmontosaurus was too dangerous for a tyrannosaurus to regularly hunt?
If it's not hunting edmontosaurus what on Earth were they eating? Besides egg eating snakes, I don't know any predator whose diet mostly consists of young animals. Some people argued that large sub adult dinosaur would have outnumbered full grown animals which would have made this tactic viable, but I don't buy that because that same rule rule would apply for the predators. Adult tyrannosaurus would have competed with sub adult and juveniles for these easier marks. Life in the wild is not easy. Most macropredators have no choice but to hunt hale prey.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on Mar 14, 2023 10:06:50 GMT 5
This probably isn't the right thread for this but I felt like talking about the more scientific orientated paleo community habit of treating carnivores like skittish opportunists. I get that they are sick of seeing carnivores treating herbivoreslike walking sacks of meat in hollywood, but c'mon do people really think an adult edmontosaurus was too dangerous for a tyrannosaurus to regularly hunt? If it's not hunting edmontosaurus what on Earth were they eating? Besides egg eating snakes, I don't know any predator whose diet mostly consists of young animals. Some people argued that large sub adult dinosaur would have outnumbered full grown animals which would have made this tactic viable, but I don't buy that because that same rule rule would apply for the predators. Adult tyrannosaurus would have competed with sub adult and juveniles for these easier marks. Life in the wild is not easy. Most macropredators have no choice but to hunt hale prey. Predator success rates vary considerably, one can't just make the suggestion that "polar bears succeed less than 2% of the time, so maybe T. rex failed as often too". Success rates are likely a function of prey densities, grouping patterns of prey species, changes in prey vulnerability, and the amount of experience in individual predators ( link->). For example, in some parts tigers can routinely kill adult gaurs 5 times their own weight ( link->). In Thailand 45.2% of all gaur killed by tigers were adults, and 55.7% of all banteng were adults ( Khaewphakdee et al., 2020). And a tiger absolutely does NOT stand a better chance of killing adult bovines 3.5-5 times its own weight than a T. rex does at killing a Edmontosaurus or Triceratops that's just as heavy as itself. Also, "many potential preys were too dangerous in a 1v1 battle". Apart from the fact that a fully grown T. rex has weapons and size that are absolutely a match for at least most of the gigantic prey it lived with (save perhaps Alamosaurus), and would thus be every bit as dangerous to them as they are to it, prey being dangerous is literally why predators don't often try to fight their prey in a Carnivora-style death battle. Predators don't play fair. They ambush their prey (I'm pretty sure this is exactly why these tigers are so successful killing bovines many times their size), get them to flee instead of fight back, attack them while they're mired in snow/mud/tar, etc., etc. Of course, this isn't to say that they can't defeat some of their dangerous prey in a 1v1 fight, but the point is they absolutely do NOT have to be able to.
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Mar 15, 2023 3:21:09 GMT 5
Something else to consider is that climate change could be severely reducing polar bear hunting success and unlike most predators they can consume plant matter like kelp in a pinch.
Yeah while it's fair to say that tyrannosaurus rarely engaged in fights to the deaths with prey, I am sure the average rex was forced to deal with an aggressive herbviore at least a few times throughout their lives. It's not uncommon to see buffalo and boars take the fights to cats and I envision a trike would somtimes do.
Tiger kills an aggressive gaur.
Even fleeing animals can fight back so predators can't afford to be that conflict averse.
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on May 12, 2023 5:25:08 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Infinity Blade on May 29, 2023 4:52:22 GMT 5
An old account of a domestic boar killing a bear in a fight. Take it for what you will. Given that it takes place in what is now Arkansas, the bear would have been an American black bear. thelibrary.org/lochist/turnbo/V14/ST439.html
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Oct 20, 2023 23:07:07 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Jan 27, 2024 10:26:22 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Feb 25, 2024 11:14:03 GMT 5
|
|
|
Post by Supercommunist on Mar 2, 2024 11:47:16 GMT 5
|
|